Young man glasses aspiring model in the face. British court system admires male violence, hates women and lets him walk scot free.

27 Dec


This is Lucie Slater and she really is quite gorgeous.  She was chasing down a career in the arts/entertainment industry and seemed to be having some success.  Unfortunately, her taste in men is atrocious.  She has been dating some thug DJ named William Aiken, which is sadly, not an unusual dating strategy for young attractive women.  Hey, let’s date assholes!  What can go wrong?  Tucker Max has made an entire career out of women’s love for dirtbag man (sorry, Tucker, you’re funny as hell, but you are a dirtbag).


So Lucie is dating a total thug and then she makes the terrible mistake of posting some stupid update on her Facebook page, and unless that update was “hey, guess what Will, I’m fucking your dad”, there was no way he was justified in even slapping her, never mind cutting her face with broken glass.  No, apparently the strong emotion that triggered such a violent protest was “dislike”.  William “disliked” her update.

So he hit her in the face with a bottle, severed an artery, left her with permanent nerve damage, and needless to say, destroyed any hope she had of a career based on her looks.


Obviously, police and courts were involved. William got kicked off his DJ gig, as most sane people know that hitting someone in the face with glass is undeniably a CRIMINAL and violent and reprehensible thing to do. Someone willing to slice open your arteries because they are incapable of handling the overwhelming emotion inspired by “dislike” is clearly not someone who should be walking about the streets freely.  Goodness, what if William hit the upper emotional register of “annoyed”?  What will the fallout be from that kind of sweeping passion?


The British Court system is evidently not populated by any sane people.  William was given a two year suspended sentence, and walked out of the court a free man.  Naturally, feminists were outraged.  What the hell?  A MAN glasses a WOMAN in the face causing permanent damage, and he walks away from that?  That kind of ruling is indicative of a deep problem, wherein male violence is normalized, and vicious and controlling behaviour is seen as natural, and thus not worthy of punishment.  I mean, hey it was just a little cut!  Get over it, little girl.

Here’s a picture of the damage:


That’s right.  It wasn’t Will who glassed Lucie, it was Lucie who glassed Will.  And it’s not feminists who were outraged at all, it was men in the MRM.

Feminists are too busy writing screechy rants reviling the men who demand justice for men like Will.

“Fuck you, MRAs for trying to make “misandry” happen”.   That’s what the lovely Kate Harding wrote in her piece for Jezebel.  Trying to make it happen, Kate?  Do you have eyes in your head, woman?  No one is trying to make anything happen.  When a woman destroys a man’s face and potentially, his entire career, and then walks away from that because she is a woman and – tee hee – it’s kind of funny when girls beat up boys anyway, isn’t it? – that’s not trying.  That IS misandry.  When it’s acceptable to physically injure a man and receive no punishment because you’re a pretty girl, that’s misandry.  When it’s considered unmanly to object to some nutbag chick slicing your face open over a fucking Facebook post, that’s misandry.

So fuck you, right back.

If a man did that to a woman, he would quite rightly be socially excoriated and have a long time to think over his actions in a jail cell.  Chris Brown gave Rhianna a fat lip and some bruises and he’s considered an animal, although that has a lot to do with him being black.  He faced consequences though.  He is still facing them.

Lucie faces none.

That’s why the MRM exists in the first place.  This blog was never really intended to be a voice in the MRM.  It was just a place for me to vent some of my stronger opinions and thoughts on the things I see going on around me.  It turns out, a lot of my thoughts and opinions align quite nicely with an important social movement, and I am happy to report that I have been nominated over at as FeMRA of the year.

Yeah, that was sarcasm.  Like I give a shit what Manboobz thinks.

I write about these issues because I have a son, and the thought of him growing up in a world where a woman can butcher his face with a bottle and face no repercussions makes me ill.  LittleDude will grow up knowing that smacking people is NEVER a good way to solve a problem, but it will sometimes be NECESSARY.  Mr. JB and I will make sure he is equipped with the skills to vigorously defend himself, and the same goes for our two girls.  Our children will know the meaning of the words “choke hold” , and understand where and when to use them.


And LittleDude, if a girl ever comes at you with a broken bottle, take the bitch down.  It doesn’t look like anyone else will.

Lots of love,


12 Responses to “Young man glasses aspiring model in the face. British court system admires male violence, hates women and lets him walk scot free.”

  1. Luke December 27, 2012 at 15:59 #

    Hi, JB. This is MinnesotaSmith again. Thank you for writing a very timely article, and sharing this news item with your readers.

    Here is an excerpt from classic statistical compilation that shows just how very right you are in saying how crucial fathers are to children. From many places on the WWW:

    Effects of Fatherlessness (US Data)
    85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes

    (Source: Center for Disease Control)
    90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes

    (Source: U.S. D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census)
    71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes

    (Source: National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools.)
    75% of all adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes

    (Source: Rainbows for all God’s Children.)
    63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes

    (Source: U.S. D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census)
    80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger come from fatherless homes

    (Source: Criminal Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26, 1978) 70% of juveniles in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes

    (Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988)
    85% of all youths sitting in prisons grew up in a fatherless home ( Source: Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of Corrections 1992)

    California has the nation’s highest juvenile incarceration rate and the nation’s highest juvenile unemployment rate. Vincent Schiraldi, Executive Director, Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, “What Hallinan’s Victory Means,” San Francisco Chronicle (12/28/95).

    These statistics translate to mean that children from a fatherless home are:
    5 times more likely to commit suicide.

    32 times more likely to run away.

    20 times more likely to have behavioral disorders.

    14 times more likely to commit rape

    9 times more likely to drop out of high school.

    10 times more likely to abuse chemical substances.

    9 times more likely to end up in a state-operated institution. 20 times more likely to end up in prison.


    “Daughters of single parents are
    53% more likely to marry as teenagers,

    164% more likely to have a premarital birth, and

    92% more likely to dissolve their own marriages.

    All these intergenerational consequences of single motherhood increase the likelihood of chronic welfare dependency.”

    Barbara Dafoe Whitehead, Atlantic Monthly (April 1993).
    Daughters of single parents are 2.1 times more likely to have children during their teenage years than are daughters from intact families.

    TheGood Family Man, David Blankenhorn.
    71% of teenage pregnancies are to children of single parents.

    U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.

    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services states that there were more than 1,000,000 documented child abuse cases in 1990. In 1983, it found that
    60% of perpetrators were women with sole custody.


  2. Erudite Knight December 27, 2012 at 16:38 #

    I thought this might be a reversal story again.

    I read the link jezebel about mras, man, I had a good laugh:
    ‘You have forever tainted those issues with your rage-filled, obsessively anti-woman horseshit, to the point where it’s become difficult for any rational, compassionate person to trust a man who claims he’s been screwed over in family court or abused by a female partner, even if he has.’

    Rage-filled obsessively anti women…

    Anyway, JB I got a serious question for you, how did YOU come to the conclusion of the vast screwing men are receiving? I do not mean any insult with my next statement, and that is the in this current society women have HUGE advantages so it is natural they would not think ‘hmm, i say I am the I really?’ So how did you break out of the cognitive dissonance?


  3. judgybitch December 27, 2012 at 17:19 #

    You know, Knight, I think it’s because I grew up with a wickedly violent mother and three brothers whom I felt utterly compelled to protect and who in turn, protected me, as much as they could.

    The idea that women are lovely and kind and that men are evil and cruel is precisely the opposite of my childhood experience.

    I’m Snow White with the the Evil Queen and the Kind Hunstman.

    I really think it comes down to that. It has never been a struggle for me to understand that women can be and are evil, awful people, and that men can be and are compassionate, loving protectors.

    Obviously, almost everybody is decent and kind, but the outliers are equally likely to be men AND women.

    As for taking advantage of the privileges I most certainly DO have, well, I suppose I care more about happiness. And for me, happiness is love. For my children, for my husband, for my friends. If I destroy that, I destroy my own happiness.

    And what the hell is the point of that?


  4. Erudite Knight December 27, 2012 at 18:03 #

    Good reasons. I guess most feminists just had weak fathers growing up among other things.

    Btw, I was cruising wordpress main page and saw you were under MRA category, how do you set a category for your blog?


  5. judgybitch December 27, 2012 at 18:17 #

    I have no idea. Pixie?


  6. Mister Grumpus December 27, 2012 at 19:33 #

    So, just to make sure I’m not too stupid:

    The picture of the woman’s face with the stitches, that’s not part of the actual story at all, right? That was from some other incident?


  7. judgybitch December 27, 2012 at 20:49 #

    Yes. It looks horrible, but not anything like the injury that William sustained. I meant to give some perspective on just how bad his injury is.


  8. Liz December 27, 2012 at 22:35 #

    The British court system is so screwed up (not saying the same wouldn’t happen here).

    I remember in 2009, businessman Munir Hussain fought back with a metal pole and a cricket bat against a knife-wielding burglar who tied up his family at their home in Buckinghamshire, and he was jailed for two and a half years…and his attacker didn’t even go to prison.


  9. princesspixiepointless December 28, 2012 at 00:36 #

    Liz, good call. The laws on fighting back in your own home were just changed this past year.


  10. gregariouswolf December 31, 2012 at 01:52 #

    Holy hell, that Jezebel article.

    “This is Fuck You Week, Jezebel’s first annual week of desperate emotional cleansing and unhinged psychic purging.”

    Kate Harding, the author of that article did come unhinged. This is exactly the kind of thing MRAs talk about. It’s a travesty of justice this woman got a slap on the wrist. Someone who truly believes in civil gender equality should be hopping mad at a sentence of community service for such a violent attack.




  1. When A Woman Hits A Man It’s Justified | Thought Catalog - June 20, 2014

    […] this particular technique myself because it is just so effective. For example, I once wrote about a man who broke a beer glass across his aspiring model girlfriend’s face, driving the glass shards in deep enough to sever an artery and leave permanent nerve damage not to […]


  2. Only L<3Ve @ - June 21, 2014

    […] this particular technique myself because it is just so effective. For example, I once wrote about a man who broke a beer glass across his aspiring model girlfriend’s face, driving the glass shards in deep enough to sever an artery and leave permanent nerve damage not to […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: