If anything bad happens, it’s not my fault! Or, the consequences of lipstick.

3 Jan

Mr. JB has decided to grow in his beard. He normally shaves every day, but over the holidays decided “fuck it”, and just let nature take its course.  He now has fairly nice coverage, and even though he finds the beard a bit itchy, it also keeps his face warm, and he saves money on razor blades!  A lot of moaning goes on in this house about the price of razor blades. Apparently, they are rather expensive, especially those fancy ones with four cutting edges.  Men are so fussy about their shaving routines, aren’t they?

seneca

Luckily, Mr. JB has the option to grow in his beard or not.  He doesn’t work in an environment that requires strict corporate formality.  It’s perfectly acceptable for him to have a beard or moustache or any other kind of facial hair he likes.  Guys like JudgyAsshole or Prince Charming, who work in slightly more formal offices COULD grow in their facial hair if they wanted to (and they DO every Movember), but that would have an impact on how they are perceived (less professional, less well-groomed, less conscientious), and so they adhere to social norms and remove their facial hair every day.

shaving

It’s kind of annoying, time-consuming and involves money.  It’s just part of the culture, and if any of them truly despised the requirement to shave, I guess they would think twice about becoming stockbrokers or surgeons.  To shave or not to shave is a choice, basically.  One that has consequences, as all choices do.

So you’re probably thinking, “yeah, yeah, what’s the fucking point?”- I just wanted a context to put today’s post in, because for me, today encapsulates so perfectly exactly what is wrong with feminist culture.

Natasha Scripture, writing for the New York Times, wants to know if make-up might be bad for women’s self-esteem.  Could the daily application of lipstick and undereye concealer actually harm women and keep them from achieving true equality (with men, I suppose, and we all know that men absolutely DO not partake in any time-consuming daily grooming rituals).   Natasha says “ah, hell no”, a little lipstick and mascara makes her feel like she’s presenting a slightly better version of herself to the world.  No harm, no foul.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/01/02/does-makeup-hurt-self-esteem

makeup

Jenna Sauers, writing at Jezebel gets her panties twisted over that one!  She writes, “in most if not all contexts, I don’t really think wearing makeup is a “choice.” At least, it’s not a choice in the sense of a decision where the branching options are neutral and equally weighted and carry few, if any, negative social consequences, the way making a ham sandwich or a veggie wrap for lunch is a choice”.

http://jezebel.com/5972605/when-is-wearing-makeup-a-choice

 

veggie wrap

Let’s think for a minute about her example:  ham sandwich or veggie wrap.  Are there any negative social consequences to choosing one over the other?  Well, the veggie wrap will probably come in with a lower calorie, salt, sugar and fat count than the ham sandwich.  Eat a ham sandwich every day, and you might find yourself packing on the pounds.  Does being fat have social consequences?  Hmm.  Yes.  Yes it does.  If you care about that, and would like to NOT get fat, you will alter your choice.  Is the veggie wrap GUARANTEED to be lower in fat and calories and help you keep off unwanted pounds?  Nope.  You’ll have to read the ingredients and figure it out for yourself.  Why that ham sandwich could be ultra low fat ham on thinly sliced gluten-free bread with a swipe of mustard!  Gosh, all that lean protein might be better for you!

You see?  That’s how choices work.  You have them, you need to make them, and you are responsible for getting the information you need to make a good choice, however you define that.  It’s called be a grown-up and taking responsibility for your own decisions.

Look at how Jenna defines choice:  the branching options are neutral, equally weighted and carry few, if any, negative social consequences.

So, if the branches are NOT neutral, the choices do NOT carry equal weight and you most certainly WILL face negative social consequences, then it’s not a choice at all?  Really?  Well, newsflash, honey:  very few, if any, choices in life will have equally weighted, neutral options with no consequences.  It’s completely childish and ridiculous to expect such a thing.

Do you detest wearing make-up?  Fine.  If it’s that big a deal to you, pick an occupation that doesn’t require you to look professional or polished.  Or go ahead and enter a professional occupation and then refuse to meet the standards and watch the promotions and opportunities pass you by because you refuse to adhere to the requirements of the job.  Whatever you like.  Do you love wearing make-up?  Great!  Go ahead and do that, but understand that there are some occupations where wearing a ton of make-up will be a detriment to your success.

construction

All of these things are your choice.  The idea that things are only a true choice if you face no negative social consequences is truly laughable.  And so very destructive.  Because if choices that come with consequences are not choices at all, then someone must be to blame for imposing them.

Give a feminist a choice with a consequence, and she’ll find someone to blame, all right.  Hint:  it won’t be herself.

This is the idea that makes me reject feminism and so many other liberal theories:  that negative social consequences are prima facie evidence that a choice has been constrained by some nefarious plot designed to undermine a victimized group of helpless beings who lack agency or will or spirit and who can thus never be held responsible for their own decisions.  It’s patronizing, infantilizing and deeply, profoundly insulting.

It’s really an amazing feat, when you consider it from afar.  Feminism, which purports to promote the interests of women has managed to claim the moral high ground by postulating a theory that reduces women to helpless victims with no capacity to make decisions or face consequences.  We are basically children, at the mercy of forces we do not ourselves possess, cannot resist and are helpless to overcome.

child

Yeah, well fuck that.  I don’t need another theory about why I’m such a helpless moron in need of salvation.  What I need is a theory of action and reaction.  Something that expresses the idea that whenever one subject takes an action, there will be a reaction.  Some kind of closed system maybe?  I guess that means the reaction might be in the opposite direction?  Hmmm. I’ll have to think about this.  I could be on to something!

Life is choice.  Choices have consequences.  Is that really so hard to understand?  You can make all the right choices, and still get screwed.  That’s life.  And moments like those, when you’ve done everything right and everything is still fucked up, that is when a tube of Chanel’s Rouge Allure in Passion comes in handy.  There is nothing quite like the perfect red lipstick to make you feel like you can face down Satan himself!  Bring it on, life.  Me and Chanel?  We can handle anything!

chanel

Lots of love,

JB

11 Responses to “If anything bad happens, it’s not my fault! Or, the consequences of lipstick.”

  1. Liz January 3, 2013 at 17:41 #

    I LOVE facial hair on men.
    Likely because (at least in part) my husband had to shave every day when he was active duty. Boo!
    Just enough to look like he is on a long vacation, but not so much that he looks like a professor is perfect.

    Like

  2. Aurini January 3, 2013 at 17:50 #

    Let’s see, what other things could Natasha Scripture (seriously?) have written about?

    *The Greatest Depression
    *War with Iran this year
    *Demographic collapse of the West
    *Anarcho-tyranny of the police state
    *The destruction of the American Constitution
    *The ongoing murder of children by Presidential-ordered drone strikes
    *The oppressive nature of lipstick

    Yeah, that last one! That’s the ticket!

    Like

  3. M3 January 3, 2013 at 19:50 #

    Awesome post, as usual.

    “Feminism, which purports to promote the interests of women has managed to claim the moral high ground by postulating a theory that reduces women to helpless victims with no capacity to make decisions or face consequences. We are basically children, at the mercy of forces we do not ourselves possess, cannot resist and are helpless to overcome.”
    THIS. We have to find a way to truncate this but keep the impact of it and put it on a t-shirt! 😀

    Like

  4. Erudite Knight January 4, 2013 at 16:00 #

    They will blame lipstick or makeup for being a male creation, but they will also be the first one dolling themselves up to try to woo the guys.

    Like

  5. Liz January 4, 2013 at 16:47 #

    It is good, but I’m not sure it can be truncated to a short tee shirt message while conveying the point.

    Maybe a picture of honey boo boo with the caption “this is our society on feminism”

    Like

  6. Liz January 4, 2013 at 17:38 #

    I think the types of women who blame lipstick and makeup on men are generally the ones who don’t “doll up” very well anyway.
    Like Sandra Fluke.

    Like

  7. dgarsys January 4, 2013 at 19:24 #

    On a shaving expenses note – try a double-edged safety razor (assuming one goes back to shaving). Sure, the handle was $45 or so, but I get roughly 200 blades for under $40, each of which is good for 3-4 shaves, minimum. Ridiculously close shaves.

    And I’m at a loss at how to truncate the “infantalizing philosophy” paragraph to make it bumper-sticker/t-shirt worthy.

    Like

  8. judgybitch January 5, 2013 at 16:04 #

    Thanks! I’ll pass that along.

    Like

  9. Anonymous January 7, 2013 at 08:07 #

    MinnesotaSmith again here. On the subject of beards: I hiked the entire Appalachian Trail in 2006 (runs over 3000 km. from Georgia to Maine in the U.S.), called “thruhiking”. Many male thruhikers grow beards. I OTOH shaved my face completely as often as I could (at least weekly). When asked why (usually by a guy with a beard), I responded that there were lots of unattached (lonely), healthy (virile) young men on the Trail, whom one would often be sleeping near in trail shelters, hostels, etc. So, why would any straight guy want to make his mouth look any more like a snatch than he could help? 😉 They’d laugh, until I added, “And, now that you know what you’re risking by having a beard, if after the next chance you have to shave it off, and you don’t, I’ll know about one of your secret hopes!” At this point, they stopped laughing — and never again suggested to me that I grow a beard. 😀

    Like

  10. Joe August 19, 2014 at 00:46 #

    I figure a basic background search these days on a prospective girlfriend should include “Does she write for Jezebel?”. I don’t care how hot she is, if she wrote an article about the joys of surprise castration, she and I are not going steady.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: