Awwww. Facebook doesn’t wike us. Boo hoo. Go fuck yourself, Facebook. What a pack of raging hypocrites.

6 Jun

boo hoo

Facebook, which already polices and censors images of illegal activities like breastfeeding and child pornography has now decided that posting anything that dares to question feminism constitutes hate speech and will be removed from the site.


From their statement:

Recently there has been some attention given to Facebook’s content policy. The current concern, voiced by Women, Action and The Media, The Everyday Sexism Project, and the coalition they represent, has focused on content that targets women with images and content that threatens or incites gender-based violence or hate.

Facebook is not the first internet organization to decide that questioning feminism constitutes hate speech. Symantec blocks sites that are critical of feminism and that openly support boys and men, including sites whose purpose is to assist boys and men who have been the victim of sexual assault!

Obviously, JudgyBitch is on the list of banned sites.  Paul Elam at Voice for Men has some serious concerns about Facebook’s decision to cave in to a small but vocal minority of radical feminists attempting to create a new world order in which women can never be criticized for anything ever.

What is happening, and it is going to happen more swiftly than you can imagine, is that just as we have seen in academia, in the military, in many workplaces and more recently in the secular community, feminists are using whatever tools are at their disposal to ensure that their narrative is the only one allowed.

Let’s take a look at what that narrative is, in a little more detail.  We’ll keep the feminist focus on gender based violence and hate.  Let’s go for a little swim through the underbelly of Facebook.  Just to be clear, nothing you are about to see or read will be prohibited under the new Facebook policy.

I’m sticking mostly to images here, as they tell the story quite beautifully, and quite frankly, reading the quotes was making me a little ill. Ready?

Let’s start with single mothers.


Sirs, please remove your heads from your anal cavities and wash the shit out of your mouths before attempting to talk to women. Please and thank you.






That is ONE Facebook page.  Just one.  There are lots more.

Here’s one for bad boyfriends.  The bad girlfriends one will obviously be protected.


mary poppins

Here we have just general ranting against boys.  Rantings against girls will be prohibited.

boys suck

Here are a few lovely ladies dreaming of murder.  Ruminations of the dismemberment of your ex-wife will be prohibited.


kill husband

Lady Gaga, my hero!  She called 911 because she just killed her boyfriend.  I hope Chris Brown has no plans for an “I just killed my girlfriend” song.  That will be prohibited, for sure!

killed my boyfriend

kill your boyfriend

Here are some pages that consider men to be less intelligent, along with one or two incitements to violence.

run over 3

stupid two

eye 3




Here are some pages declaring female supremacy with accompanying incitements to violence.  These are acceptable.  Declare male supremacy and you will be banned.



The ever lovely and ever inspiring “Divorce Cake” industry, in which decapitation seems rather popular, and we totally know cutting a man’s head off is just fair play, right?  No violence or hate there.

cake 8

cake 7

cake 6

cake 5

cake 4

cake 3

cake 2

cake 1

A bit more female supremacy.



September 14, 2012 at 12:33pm · Like

Tracey Darling Actually… pigs are more intelligent.


Here’s a suggestion from Rabid Feminist on Facebook.


Owl Laugh Hahaha - No

You know why this whole shitstorm doesn’t really bother me all that much?

Young people are abandoning Facebook in droves.  Their minds cannot be reached by the radicals who wish to dictate what they may and may not think.  The oldies have taken over, and the kids don’t want to be friends with the “get off my lawn brigade”.


This week’s Economist has a story about the emergence of liberalism in Britain’s youth population, but they use the word differently than North Americans do.  Liberalism is not being liberal in the sense of being extremely accommodating and generous with state monies.

Liberalism in the British sense means personal freedom, rule of law, active but accountable government, free but responsible markets, mutual toleration and equal concern for all.


And it is the younger generation that is liberal.

Polling by YouGov shows that those aged 18 to 24 are more likely than older people to consider social problems the responsibility of individuals rather than government. They are deficit hawks. They care about the environment, but are also keen on commerce: more supportive of the privatisation of utilities, more likely to reject government attempts to ban branding on cigarette packets and more likely to agree that Tesco, Britain’s supermarket giant, “has only become so large by offering customers what they want”.

As has always been the case, the young have different beliefs than the older generation, but they are less likely to go to the polls to express those beliefs in a concrete way.  That will change as they get older.  And they are a voting block to be reckoned with.

Barack Obama would not have been elected in 2008 except for his ability to mobilize that youth block. In the 2012 election, young republicans headed to the polls to try and defeat him.  The state of nations will come increasingly to depend on those young voters.

And those voters are precisely the ones who couldn’t give a rat’s ass about Facebook.  The young don’t like being told what to think and what they are allowed to read or see, especially not by ideologues who have been a key part of why they face hardships their own parents did not.

Facebook is nailing its own coffin shut by further alienating the young in service to rabid feminism.



The day Facebook dies is the day I’ll bake a divorce cake.  We’ll cut Facebook’s head off.  And enjoy every minute of it.

fuck off

Fuck you, Facebook.

Lots of love,


55 Responses to “Awwww. Facebook doesn’t wike us. Boo hoo. Go fuck yourself, Facebook. What a pack of raging hypocrites.”

  1. Liz June 6, 2013 at 15:02 #

    Well, I don’t wike facebook either. The feeling’s mutual.

    Next, they’ll start handing out personal information to third parties and governments. Oops…they already do.


  2. Ryan June 6, 2013 at 15:13 #

    Nice to feel vindicated for never even setting up a facebook account.

    We should admit, though, the one with Barbie cleaning up and Ken’s head in the freezer is effing hilarious.


  3. Xayadvara June 6, 2013 at 15:19 #

    Hmmmm, actually it might be a blessing in disguise.

    The best way to bring attention to something is by banning it or slamming it. Red flag generally does grab people’s attention. I think a potential for backfiring is lurking around somewhere.


  4. Marlo Rocci June 6, 2013 at 15:47 #

    What I expect to see is every social media outlet short of hard core porn sites be attacked in this manner. This is why I run my own server and do minimal work on Facebook.


  5. desperada57 June 6, 2013 at 16:12 #

    Hey, I LIKE Britain’s brand of liberalism! I think we need to import it.


  6. Marlo Rocci June 6, 2013 at 16:30 #

    The only way to guarantee free speech is to own the media you’re serving it on.


  7. LostSailor June 6, 2013 at 16:58 #

    The cognitive dissonance on that “deadbeat dad” page is staggering. One part over-the-top celebration of the awesomeness of single moms and one part disparagement of fathers in general coupled with lust for their cash.

    Yeah, dad’s you are worthless scum that suck ass and deserve to be killed, but send us cash. (How they’re going to send cash when dead, we’ll figure out later; maybe mandatory life insurance policies–wait, I don’t want to give them any ideas.)

    In the face of a growing backlash, feminism can only survive by dismissing and silencing any other narrative. Evolutionary psychology is a rather new field of study, but is already showing promising results with testable theories and studies. But it is dismissed out of hand as nonsense and bullshit by feminists; they absolutely cannot afford to engage in even a discussion about it–and they vehemently won’t–lest it receive any iota of credibility. They know that such a field of study is a death-knell for feminism.

    Here’s a comment I lifted from another blog:

    nearly the entire field is pure fabrication, most of which has no purpose other than to biologically essentialize gendered social constructs (and in doing so it is, in its present incarnation, an anti-feminist project)

    . See? It can’t be real or true because it disproves a core pillar of feminist theory, QED. The worst part: that comment was written by a man.

    It’s going to get worse. Feminism will not go quietly…


  8. M3 June 6, 2013 at 17:10 #

    I use FB mainly for hosting my many photo albums and pictures for friends and family, both here and overseas. It would suck to leave but i’ve already made peace with the fact that if FB continues to block information that counters feminist lies, i will vote with my feet and close down my account.

    It’s time to take a closer look at Google+ anyways. I don’t need hundreds of fairweather friends.. only the ones that truly matter.

    The funny thing is, FB was never in any danger of losing it’s audience due to a few vulgar offensive pages (which everyone had to tolerate) because for the most part, it is women that drive the need for social media and built an economy model out of it. Did FB seriously think women would leave en masse if it didn’t capitulate?

    Rather now, they will see a real exodus of users (mostly the straggling males) who have grown tired of this shit. There’s already a drop in membership as users flock to Twitter. Prepare to see Twitter, Tumblr and WordPress get assaulted by the same feminist cunt patrol that went after FB.

    It ain’t over by a long shot. But if they come after WordPress, there will be an awakening the likes of which has never been witnessed!


  9. feeriker June 6, 2013 at 17:23 #

    As I stated over at AVFM, I now fully realize why I’ve always despised Facebook and refuse to have anything to do with it. I despise social media in general, these apparently being mostly the province of BS-spewing adultolescents who, for reasons known only to themselves and other brain stem-driven human beings, think that the rest of the world gives a pile of dried dog shit about the most intricate and private details of their lives. I’ve always thought that a more appropriate name for FB would be TMI.

    All of the above said, and even considering all of the well-justified outrage over FB’s patronizing heavy-handedness, here’s a thought: let the market do its magic. Should FB continue to disrespect and offend a sizable number of its customers, it will suffer accordingly. I have no doubt that there is some entrepreneur out there just waiting for FB to make the ultimate boneheaded move in terms of alienating its customer base, at which point said entrepreneur will launch a competing site that welcomes viewpoints and opinions of EVERYBODY – with a TOS clause that essentially warns potential customers to “grow a thick skin or take your business elsewhere.”

    If such a SM site were to launch, I just might be persuaded to set up an account there.


  10. feeriker June 6, 2013 at 17:32 #

    As JB pointed out, it’s classical (i.e., REAL) liberalism, which = respect for individual liberty and natural law. Sadly, as George Orwell warned, the corruption of the English language has become so advanced that most people are unaware of the word’s real definition.


  11. feeriker June 6, 2013 at 17:35 #

    The worst part: that comment was written by a man.

    No, it was written by a mangina. Very big difference.


  12. feeriker June 6, 2013 at 17:41 #

    It’s time to take a closer look at Google+ anyways.

    I’d be very careful in dealing with anything Google. Not only are they another prime target within the crosshairs of the Feministablishment, they’ve also caved in to the warrantless Stasi Polizeistaat demands for user account data on demand. Any IT services provider that caves so quickly to unlawful government demands is one that anyone who respects freedom should want as little to do with as possible.


  13. Goober June 6, 2013 at 17:48 #

    If evolution is the accepted theory for the diversity of species, then you have to accept some pretty politically incorrect ideas along with it. One is that since evolution works on the brain, and given that men and women have been under different evolutionary pressures since the dawn of humanity, that quantifiable biological differences between a man and woman’s brain HAVE TO exist.

    The discussion is not whether men and women are different, but rather in which ways they are different.

    Where feminism goes off the rail is in their inability to understand that “different” does not mean “less” or “more,” and does not necessarily preclude equal”


  14. Marlo Rocci June 6, 2013 at 17:51 #

    What I would not want to see out of this is a counter-censorship movement to try to remove all the misandrist material on facebook. I figure just let all the stuff that says boys are bad stay right there. And let the fact that men are strong enough to tolerate images hateful of men be the message.


  15. LostSailor June 6, 2013 at 18:27 #

    I stand corrected…


  16. Radical Suburbanite June 6, 2013 at 18:31 #

    The over-the-top reactions against evolutionary psychology leads me to think there is really something to it. You just say the words and your average feminist freaks out.


  17. Keen Observer June 6, 2013 at 18:39 #

    It’s unlikely to, unfortunately. The “coalition” has been entirely framing this as a strict rape/assault/incitement to violence against women thing, and that’s what all my FB friends who have reposted it have been supporting. Censorship against anti-feminist stuff never factors into it, so they won’t know that’s going to be a cost. And they won’t know about the violence-against-men double standard, either.


  18. Izanpo June 6, 2013 at 20:05 #

    This sort of misandrist double-standard has been around long before Facebook. (I like FB only for the cute dog/cat videos and kooky squareheads trying to dive into iced over swimming pools.)

    Think back to the John Wayne/Lorena Bobbitt incident. Joe Average gets his Johnson amputated in a violent manner = endless comedy goldmine for Leno and Letterman. Flip this scenario around – would anyone be making jokes about impromptu FGM with a paring knife?


  19. Glenfiilthie June 6, 2013 at 20:40 #

    I don’t think it is the feminists driving this.

    Consider: and earlier post from our hostess describes the cunned stunts over at Jezebel perving out over pictures of cartoon children. Every time you turn around one of these man-hating lesbian clowns or menstrual nutbars is making an ass of herself in a very public way.

    I think somebody is using them as useful fools….and I think they are using the queers the same way.

    In any event I threw facebook away a looooong time ago. Struck me as a chick-thing.


  20. Hippie Redneck June 6, 2013 at 20:45 #

    Those divorce cakes make the NRA’s ex-girlfriend shooting dummy look tame.


  21. Marlo Rocci June 6, 2013 at 21:04 #

    I love that divorce cakes facebook page. It pretty much sums up my views on marriage.


  22. Jamie Ryan June 6, 2013 at 22:28 #

    Love the blog, figured it was about time to leave a comment, things seem to be coming to a head and I’m glad that there are sane people such as yourselves here to point out the hypocritical bullshit that most don’t want to even acknowledge.


  23. Murray Pearson June 6, 2013 at 23:18 #

    While security by obscurity isn’t secure, you can avoid the hassles of drive-by attacks by using an unpopular platform. The scatter-gun attacks will go after WordPress, not UserLand Frontier, and not after modern frameworks like Django which are hardened against attack.

    Consider learning how to use Django, and rather than using a CMS you use a CMS *framework* such as Mezzanine (an excellent product). You can vary the details of the implementation and inspect/control every step in the process. Rather than a product, you have an excellent toolchest and rulebook which you can modify as you wish.

    This is unlikely to become a popular way to publish, because it depends on learning how the damn thing works. Most people are too intellectually slothful to enjoy that.


  24. Petey June 7, 2013 at 00:04 #

    Yeah, I find most of these are hilarious, even though I’m a man. I think the problem with feminists is that they have no sense of humour…


  25. M3 June 7, 2013 at 00:28 #

    “This is unlikely to become a popular way to publish, because it depends on learning how the damn thing works. Most people are too intellectually slothful to enjoy that.”

    Guilty as charged. Tho i will look into what you’ve written. If i used to operate computers using DOS, screw around with config.sys files and setup and operate BBS systems… surely this can’t be soooo hard.


  26. Flaming_Man_of_Iron June 7, 2013 at 01:03 #

    Part of it is that Facebook’s activity is something like 80% female. Membership is tilted a bit in favor of women, I think… what they’re trying to do is cater to their customer base.

    going after legitimate hate sites is fine, but the broad ban is silly.


  27. Phero June 7, 2013 at 01:13 #

    The problem with “let them know we can take it” is that it continues to grow and will get far more extreme than it is now.
    They need to be shamed, unfortunately only the MGTOW have the nerve to shame them as they should be because most men are just afraid they will never get laid in their lives again.


  28. Murray Pearson June 7, 2013 at 01:50 #

    Here’s the CMS:

    And the underlying framework, Django:

    You can also, apparently, twist the Google App Engine to run Django, but I’m happy running it in a conventional Linux cloud slice.


  29. Vladimir June 7, 2013 at 07:38 #

    You seem to not realize that the search engines – google – are the next target for feminists. And they will succeed.
    I don’t know from where do you get your optimism. I see no evidence of things changing for the better. We’ll continue to let feminists run the world until it all comes crumbling down.
    Nice article here:


  30. sonichu June 7, 2013 at 08:21 #

    “Where feminism goes off the rail is in their inability to understand that “different” does not mean “less” or “more,” and does not necessarily preclude equal””

    Nailed it. It all comes back to positivism and the mindset that if you can’t measure it, it’s not real. Ironically, a lot of what feminists call ‘patriarchy’ can be traced back to the same poisoned well.


  31. Martinez June 7, 2013 at 09:47 #

    I agree with you man. That’s why we who appose feminist scum need to start getting emails and the likes so that when we can no longer use google or any of the other site we can still organize things like poster campaigns and letter box drops, etc.


  32. deb June 7, 2013 at 10:08 #

    I notice none of the images you show are photographs. No photographs of women beaten and abused -this is an example of something this coalition of women’s groups wanted removed. 1 in 4 women will be the victim of domestic violence, and 2 women a week are murdered by a partner or ex partner. The fb pages applauded rape and violence against women and children -not cartoons with funny quips, but sick comments and photographs, full of hate


  33. Exfernal June 7, 2013 at 12:24 #

    “1 in 4 women will be the victim of domestic violence, and 2 women a week are murdered by a partner or ex partner.”

    Source? One not listed herehere, please.


  34. judgybitch June 7, 2013 at 12:36 #

    Oh, you mean like the photograph of the woman punching the man in the face? Is that the one you noticed I didn’t show?

    Funny that slipped by you. It’s almost like you think women punching men isn’t abuse…..


  35. Orphan Wilde June 7, 2013 at 13:29 #

    Eh, it was an excuse. Account deleted. Granted, rarely used the thing, but even so.


  36. Exfernal June 7, 2013 at 16:44 #

    Domestic violence:
    the U.S. data (PDF)
    the Washington Post article.


  37. wtfwhatever June 7, 2013 at 18:36 #

    That was awesome, thank you!


  38. Exfernal June 7, 2013 at 19:16 #

    Actually, The Washington Times.


  39. GrimGhost June 7, 2013 at 19:21 #

    84.6 percent of blog-comment statistics are made up.


  40. Josh June 7, 2013 at 19:37 #

    Do we know what any specific comments said that were banned? I’d like to see a mirror so we know specifically what Facebook is taking a stand against.


  41. Kreese Baldwin June 7, 2013 at 20:00 #

    This is what it looks like when you keep a bitch in check:


  42. feeriker June 7, 2013 at 21:03 #

    I’ve moved almost completely away from any Microsoft OS or apps and have gone open source (Ubuntu, Debian, or Fedora OSes and associated apps). While to an extent that constitutes STO, it also enables more efficient use of computing resources and lets you better control/restrict the resources you use, thus closing up a lot of wholes that Gates & Gang, along with software vendors who cater to their OS, bundle reflexively into their expensive and buggy bloatware.


  43. feeriker June 7, 2013 at 21:06 #

    What people don’t realize is that there are plenty of other search engines out there that are just as effective as Google, but just lesser known. Cyberlesson number one: Where options are available, ALWAYS choose the lesser-known (Brand B) option. Google and other prominent tools have become low-hanging fruit not only for censors, but for malicious programmers and cyberspies as well.


  44. feeriker June 7, 2013 at 21:08 #

    Funny that slipped by you. It’s almost like you think women punching men isn’t abuse…..

    Oh, but of course it isn’t. How can those big, strong, burly, nasty men be ABUSED by a l’il hunnert-pound-soakin-wet gal? Why he shouldn’t even be able to FEEL her sockin’ him one on the chops!


  45. feeriker June 7, 2013 at 21:11 #

    The title behind that first link reminds me of an unanswered question I’ve long had: what is the female equivalent of getting kicked in the nuts (and NO, the answer is NOT “menstrual cramps!”)


  46. feeriker June 7, 2013 at 21:13 #

    specifically what Facebook is taking a stand against

    They’re working on that right now, but it’ll probably be a few days or at least a week until something “official” is announced. Remember that it takes time to come up with well-crafted dissembling.


  47. judgybitch June 7, 2013 at 21:36 #


    Giving birth hurts

    Labor is manageable, but that head!



  48. Exfernal June 9, 2013 at 11:20 #

    A little experiment.

    Who is more likely to be blamed? Especially with all the trumpeting about “violence against women”. This is how statistics are being skewed.


  49. Erudite Knight June 12, 2013 at 04:07 #

    If they control the message well enough…then it really might be game over.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: