Slutty feminist WOMEN with fucked up personal lives are heroes. Slutty feminist MEN with fucked up personal lives are mentally ill traitors. Really now, Hugo, you didn’t see this coming?

3 Aug

It’s interesting to me to see the compassionate response the complete meltdown of male feminist Hugo Schwyzer has elicited from the very men he has repeatedly attacked for their supposed “misogyny” and hatred of women.


Paul Elam at A Voice for Men expresses his sorrow at the mess Hugo has found himself in, and places enormous truth value on Hugo’s claims that he suffers from a fairly serious mental health problem.

To be completely honest, for the first time I actually feel sympathy for this troubled soul. His unchecked sociopathy and childlike lack of governance over his base impulses have led him to a place few gender ideologues will ever go: To simultaneous personal and professional destruction.

William Pierce at The Spearhead has similar thoughts:  Hugo has some crazy in his pants, and while Pierce doesn’t demonstrate quite the compassion that Paul does, he takes the prospect of Schwyzer being suicidal quite seriously, although he is quick to place the responsibility right where it belongs. Fair enough.  Men do commit suicide at alarmingly high rates that amount to a national healthcare crisis.

Finally, I’d like to point out how topsy-turvy things are when we have male feminists fooling around with porn stars and flying to Ukraine (Lord knows what Hugo was up to there) while manosphere writers cause scandals by settling down in monogamous relationships. It’s a crazy world out there…

Hugo, when you behave in this manner, it isn’t your critics who are causing your problems: it’s you.

I’m not criticizing any man who lines up behind Hugo, or demonstrates empathy or concern.  In fact, it’s a pretty terrific example of exactly how NOT cold-hearted and quasi-violent men who question feminist ideology are towards those who routinely attempt to shame them into silence.


When a man is hurting, other men at least pause to consider that someone here is hurting.

That’s a pretty beautiful sentiment.

When it comes to Hugo, I don’t share it.  Not for one second.  I think Hugo is being a total pussy and missing out on a fantastic opportunity to point out the fucking hypocrisy of the ideology he has thrown himself behind professionally and personally.

step off

What Hugo should be saying is “Step off, bitches.  You do the same shit and spin it as liberation and freedom. My personal life is none of your goddamn business”.

Let’s start with the Grande Dame of feminism herself:  Simone de Beauvoir.  She supposedly had an “open relationship” with Jean Paul Sartre, and she pursued him for her entire life.


Yet in this lifelong relationship of supposed equals, he, it turned out, was far more equal than she was. It was he who engaged in countless affairs, to which she responded on only a few occasions with longer-lasting passions of her own. Between the lines of her fiction and what are in effect six volumes of autobiography, it is also evident that De Beauvoir suffered deeply from jealousy. She wanted to keep the image of a model life intact. There were no children. They never shared a house and their sexual relations were more or less over by the end of the war, though for much of their life and certainly at the last, they saw each other daily.

Is de Beauvoir a pathetic simpleton who can’t get it through her head that her cheating genius will never, ever ruck up with a ring and a dress?  Is she mentally ill to allow her life to be dictated by a man who openly sleeps with other women while she seethes at home alone with jealousy?  Does anyone question her feminism because she plays the role of the dupe?  All her passions governed by one man, whom she cannot have?

Nope.  She’s a goddamn hero.


Erica Jong launched sluttiness as a virtue in 1971 with her book Fear of Flying.  Married four times, she reveled in the fuck and run mentality.

“The zipless fuck is absolutely pure. It is free of ulterior motives. There is no power game . The man is not “taking” and the woman is not “giving.” No one is attempting to cuckold a husband or humiliate a wife. No one is trying to prove anything or get anything out of anyone. The zipless fuck is the purest thing there is. And it is rarer than the unicorn. And I have never had one.”

The book is one long erotic fantasy of just grabbing and banging whatever guy gets your motor running, and women embraced the challenge rather thoroughly, all the while lauding Jong for her audacity and the liberating effects of zipless, no strings attached fucking.

Eat, Love, Pray?  Hell yeah, ladies, ditch your husband and kids and go on a sex and food tour.  It’s good for you!


Sex and the City?  Ladies, if you are not cultivating greed, avarice, tons of stupidly expensive shoes and bedposts notched to toothpicks, you are doing feminism WRONG!


…to dismiss the programme entirely on the basis of its shortcomings as a feminist text would also be to lose out on what it does deliver. Just to take the most headline-grabbing example, that includes some pretty frank discussion of sex, in which female sexual pleasure and agency is obviously considered a fundamental right, rather than a privilege.

Ladies, you have a fundamental right to be a slut!  Okay, I’ll buy it.

Why don’t men have the same fundamental right?  Why doesn’t Hugo?

Granted, Hugo has been a bad, bad boy.


Sex with undergrads.

A botched attempt to murder a girlfriend while high on who the hell knows what.

Cheating on his wife with a 27 year old sex worker.  NSFW.


All the while railing against older men lusting after younger women.

And cheering for monogamy.

Yeah, so Hugo is a giant fucking hypocrite.  This is news?  The real question is why, Hugo, do your lady friends get a pass for all their shitty behavior without anyone questioning their ideological commitment or veracity, while you are driven to the brink of suicide by doing the exact same shit?

Riddle me that.

Sex with students?  When the teacher is a woman, that’s just all good fun!


“There is still a double standard out there, and it’s almost a joke — ‘Hey, he got hit on by some pretty teacher, what’s he complaining about?’ ” said Ramsland, who has worked with the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit. “Many don’t see it as much of a crime, and one of the factors that women are getting off easier is some don’t see them as a big of a threat as a man.

Getting a pass for attempted murder?  There are too many to even cite, but I love this woman who hired a HITMAN (who was really a police officer) to kill her husband and she got the full out pussy pass.  No penalty of any kind.

Women’s justice groups are urging the Supreme Court to stand by a decision that acquitted a Nova Scotia woman for trying to hire a hit man to kill her estranged husband due to years of abuse.

The abuse was so severe the husband was awarded custody of their daughter.  Must have been really bad, right?  Or complete and utter bullshit.

Older women lusting after younger men?  Why, that’s just natural!  All that young, virile sperm.  And the muscle tone of a young man!  Ooh, baby.  Bring it on.


As women decline in fertility, their sex drive gets a supercharge in order to maximize their remaining baby-making chances, new research from the University of Texas at Austin reveals. Women in the low-fertility group (ages 27-45) were much more likely to report having more sex, wanting more sex, and having more (and more intense) sexual fantasies. “If you’re trying to maximize your remaining fertility, it makes sense to seek out a younger partner because his sperm is healthier,” says lead researcher Judith Easton.

And monogamy?  What’s that?  Why should women embrace that dreary old shit?  I particularly love this story, plastered everywhere, about how Simon Cowell knocked up his best friend’s wife!  She is apparently delighted to have snagged the BabyMama Crown from the grasping hands of the other members of the Aching Ovaries Brigade.


None of these issues, or women, are being called out on feminist media sites. Nothing to see here.  La la la la.  The top stories on Jezebel?

What to do with your slobbery drunk friends?  Fuck ‘em, is basically the advice. Gosh.  Lovely to see women lining up in each other’s corners, no?

What to do when your period is so heavy you can’t go to work!  Jesus.  How heavy does it have to be? What is your job?  Shark tamer?


Lindy West, who gets bigger with every new post, had a breastmilk lollipop.  Ewww. Do you have suck everything that comes near your mouth, Lindy?  Really?  No limits at all?

The rest of the stories are just as compelling.  Jezebel has lots to say, but very little of it focuses on the issues that Hugo is being excoriated for all over the feminist media.

Hugo, ask yourself why.  Why is it that WOMEN get a pass for doing all the same shit you do, or at the very least are met with some pretty deafening silence, while YOU are basically being deprived of your ability to make a living or contribute to society in a way that you want to contribute.

Notice something else, too.

Look carefully at who came to your defence.  It wasn’t the pack of fucking bitches who are willing to toss you under the bus for committing the exact same infractions they extol when women are the protagonists.

It was men.  And a few men in particular.


You’re a fool, Hugo, if you cave into the demands that you present yourself as mentally damaged, in need of medications and self-flagellation.  Your lady friends might forgive you this time, but you will always walk that tightrope of being barely acceptable and you will always be the first one they sacrifice.

You went to the Dark Side in search of cookies, Hugo, not seeming to realize that feminists HATE cookies.

Come into the light.  We have cookies, and everything else too!


Start here.

And please, whatever you do, do not give them the satisfaction of destroying you utterly.  They won’t mourn you.  Not for one second. Don’t become another tragic statistic.  Your crimes were not crimes at all.  Being human is not a crime.

Even if you happen to be male and human at the same time.

Lots of love,


[We all survived the surgery, just so you know, and everyone is happy and healthy back at home]

31 Responses to “Slutty feminist WOMEN with fucked up personal lives are heroes. Slutty feminist MEN with fucked up personal lives are mentally ill traitors. Really now, Hugo, you didn’t see this coming?”

  1. Wallace Black August 3, 2013 at 15:04 #

    This is because feminism gives a hail mary pass victim card, so a woman and a man can never be equally judged in a feminist’s eyes because VICTIM CARD. There’s no such thing as misandry because VICTIM CARD. The way they talk about “the patriarchy” makes it sound like a cabal of old guys sit in a room deciding the fate of the world, and go “heh heh how shall we make women victims today?”. Sigh.


  2. Emma the Emo August 3, 2013 at 15:21 #

    The guy kinda reminds me of Peter Keating from The Fountainhead. Pitiable but dangerous, and you get a feeling there’s not much of a real person left in there. To stand up to feminist hypocricy, he’d have to actually care about something other than his public image and feminist approval.


  3. The Real Peterman August 3, 2013 at 15:26 #

    I’m glad your little girl is alright.


  4. Keanu August 3, 2013 at 15:33 #

    Hey JB, glad you’re all good. A few notes:

    Fear of flying was about zipless, no strings attached fucking? I read it, thought it was more about just the fantasy of fucking someone, and you both decide you want it but don’t do it. Did I miss something?

    Hugo’s ego investment into the feminist matrix, paradigm, or whatever you want to call it, has to be HUGE by now, even if he was operating outside that matrix by showing younger women pictures of his dick. Maybe he is actually ‘mentally ill,’ but somehow I highly doubt that. It’s more likely that he just got bored sexually in his current relationship and decided to act on it. That’s all. Nooot like he’s the first guy ever to do that.

    As awesome as it would be to have Hugo come out and start calling out feminist bullshit, I highly doubt that will happen.

    Damn, sucks to be him right now though.


  5. Emma the Emo August 3, 2013 at 16:02 #

    I wonder if he believes in his own brand of feminism. He bashes one thing as morally wrong, then does it himself. I wonder how it feels like to build a whole public identity/career on lies? Does it make them feel like they wasted their life? Some people are willing to do it for the money and fame, but with age, all sorts of doubts sneak into our heads. You can’t buy the meaning of life with money or fame.

    Not to mention it leads to never finding out who you are and what you want. A person who doesn’t know themselves and their vices, is more vulnerable to committing bad behavior.

    Btw, now everyone’s comparing Hugo to Mark Minter, but I disagree with that analogy. MM did the thing he himself said was foolish. HS did the thing he himself said was morally wrong. There’s a big difference. A feminist example of Mark Minter would be a feminist who says “Yes, marriage in general is bad for a woman’s health and freedom, but this guy is so good and I can’t help but want to cook him breakfast every day. I will marry him”.


  6. Marlo Rocci August 3, 2013 at 16:04 #

    I know this is absolutely wrong, but there’s just something about the idea of a feminist male putting the gun to his head and pulling the trigger when the female hoards turn on him that makes me smile. He won’t, of course. Feminist men are inherently cowards and cowards fear death.

    He’ll just cry and whine and blame the patriarchy for all his issues. That’s what they all do. No honor at all in that crowd.

    But Hugo, if you’re reading this, you aren’t sick, you’re just a guy. But you’ve been told by all the wrong people that being a guy means being sick. That’s what’s really fucking up your life and making you do stupid things. You’ve been taught self loathing. Come into the man-cave. We have cookies and beer. well, mostly beer.


  7. feeriker August 3, 2013 at 18:38 #

    Dare we hope that maybe, just maybe, we’ll witness that once-in-a-millennium event where a feminist (even one of the male sex) admits that they were completely wrong? That everything they’ve espoused, believed in, preached to others, and held to heart is a lie? Hugo would certainly appear to have nothing left to lose at all by doing so at this point.

    I’m fantasizing, of course. I’m assuming that the minds of Hugo and other feministos (if I may be permitted to masculinize the word to describe male feminists like Hugo and his cohorts) operate within the realm of logic, something I know better than to even think is the reality.


  8. Chris August 3, 2013 at 18:48 #

    Thnk the man was an idiot, and you should never trust socialists, even if they are girls.

    But the man needs to be comforted a little as he is given the red pill.


  9. Chris August 3, 2013 at 18:48 #

    PS. Glad the kids OK. Best wishes and prayers (even if you don’t accept talking to the management) for recovery.


  10. Bonnie Prince Fred Flange August 3, 2013 at 18:59 #

    Two thoughts: compare how fellow feminists have treated Hugo with how the founders of feminism got treated by their own: chewed up and spat out by those who were “more” radical and pure in heart. See feminist Susan Faludi’s April 2013 New Yorker history article about how second-wave “founders” like Ti-Grace Atkinson and Susan Brownmiller got thrown over, with more energy spent on thought purification than activism for any particular goal.

    I was fearful some of the kerfluffle over Mr. Minter in the ‘sphere (e.g. Roosh especially) was sadly similar in tone to Jezebel-like shaming, though time seems to have calmed things down a bit. Maybe it is a guy thing that way: I always thought Minter was bleeding raw when he wrote, so I never saw him as any kind of prophet and wished him well on his engagement. While Hugo’s stridency in particular offended me, now that he’s fallen for good I can’t bring myself to put the boot in.


  11. reyeko August 3, 2013 at 20:26 #

    The case with the hitman that you mentioned has had a new development recently, the women during her trials smeared the RCMP saying they refused to help her and other such accusations. This sparked an inquiry into how the RCMP treated her and they were just cleared as having treated her correctly. Part of the basis for her getting off is that the RCMP ignored her pleas for help and so she was driven to the extreme, however it’s just been proven that the RCMP acted properly, given this new evidence(which should have been looked into in the first place) we will have to see if they reopen the case.


  12. Stuart August 3, 2013 at 23:44 #

    I have to say, your comments are so well thought out. Every time I read some crack pots views (almost always American) I worry for my children’s future. Reading your posts makes me realise sanity can have a voice. Thank you!


  13. thehumanscorch August 4, 2013 at 02:58 #

    This is what happens when you listen to BULLSHIT and let it push you into denial.

    He’s a man just like any other. Simple as that.


  14. Erudite Knight August 4, 2013 at 04:54 #

    He was a chump, no sympathy from me.


  15. Tytalus August 4, 2013 at 05:28 #

    More of a random comment, guys like this are a total idiot. JB, you up for eviscerating this idiot?


  16. Sasha August 4, 2013 at 08:48 #

    Makes you wonder why he was so desperate for approval from castrating feminists.


  17. troglodyte or so they tell me August 4, 2013 at 10:33 #

    Maybe it’s me, but I say to hell with Hugo.

    You are right to criticize, and how you criticize the feminist point of view regarding Hugo but I think what he is doing right now, including his so called Thursday night suicide attempt with Klonopin followed up with a brag session to LA Weekly about it 12 hours later is total and complete bullshit intended to 1) prop up his story to psychologists he may see, 2) prop up his story to future courtrooms, 3) prop up his story to his wife about how ill he is, 4) position him to keep his tenured position at PCC

    Hugo is a sociopath and manipulator. The feminists need to ask how come they didn’t recognize this until a year ago, when the manosphere has been telling them that for a decade. They need to ask themselves that if they were so wrong on Hugo, what else have they been so wrong about?

    Regarding Hugo, he made his bed, let him lie in it.


  18. troglodyte or so they tell me August 4, 2013 at 10:58 #

    Valerie Solanas? Well Valerie Solanas was mentally ill, poor thing, she didn’t really mean to hole Andy Warhol, and she was being satirical when she wrote the scum manifesto….

    Hugo Schwyzer? He tried to kill his girlfriend!


  19. Take Back Your Face! August 4, 2013 at 21:11 #

    Actually Hugo himself said he is mentally ill. He is a drug addict. He has been in and out of psyche wards and attempted suicide several times, and murder at least once. Its all on his own blog. The man needs help.

    But what I don’t get JB, is if you are so “anti-slut” then why are you so “pro-porn”?

    I recently left a comment under one of your pro-porn articles that while I am not in favor of an all out governmental ban, I do think the UK politician (or whatever he is) has the right idea of allowing people to opt in or out of porn by IP address on their computers.

    If adults want to opt in and spend their precious and limited time searching for adult porn, go for it. But I shouldn’t have to be subjected to extreme pornographic images that I have not sought out. And this has happened to me more than once, that too when I was on the net with children.

    And if porn is such a human right and civil right, those who feel that way should not feel negatively if their own kids choose to aspire to become porn actors when they reach legal adult age. If such people feel negatively about it, then that is the height of hypocrisy.


  20. Take Back Your Face! August 4, 2013 at 21:20 #

    “Let’s start with the Grande Dame of feminism herself: Simone de Beauvoir. She supposedly had an “open relationship” with Jean Paul Sartre, and she pursued him for her entire life.”

    As far as I’m aware, Hugo’s marriage was not “open”. He was sneaking around and cheating on his wife. But beyond that, the man is in fact mentally ill and a drug addict and he needs serious professional help. “Manning up” and telling internet “bitches” to “back off” is not going to change that. Time away from the drama of the internet and in the office of a trained, professional mental health practitioner is what he needs. Perhaps even some very carefully prescribed and monitored pharmaceuticals, which I normally oppose. But his mental illness and drug addiction is very extreme, if you read his own account of multiple suicide attempts and at least one murder attempt, at his own website.

    He, his wife and child, are all going through hell right now.


  21. Take Back Your Face! August 4, 2013 at 21:31 #

    Never heard of Ti-Grace but Susan Brownmiller got criticised for being “too radical” not radical enough. Innit?


  22. Take Back Your Face! August 5, 2013 at 06:39 #

    The following has absolutely no relevance in Hugo’s case:

    “Slutty feminist WOMEN with fucked up personal lives are heroes. Slutty feminist MEN with fucked up personal lives are mentally ill traitors. Really now, Hugo, you didn’t see this coming?”

    See it coming? Feminists have known all along he’s a fake and an attempted murderer, which he openly admits to on his own blog.

    Blimey! This goes way beyond “slutty behavior” or “consensual open relationships” ala Grande Dame style. (What’s wrong with open relationships anyway?)

    The so called “red pill Manosphere” takes Feminists to task for supposedly “turning a blind eye” to the hypocritical, often illegal behavior of male feminists or men they see as furthering the “feminist agenda” but now when Feminists have long pegged Hugo as a hypocrite (what to speak of attempted murderer) all of a sudden the Sphere’s ladies’ auxilary takes them to task for – what exactly?


  23. LostSailor August 5, 2013 at 15:21 #

    You’re a fool, Hugo, if you cave into the demands that you present yourself as mentally damaged, in need of medications and self-flagellation.

    Sorry, Hugo Schwyzer is a narcissistic alcoholic drug addict and fame whore. Needless to say that he also has poor impulse control issues. I don’t have much sympathy for him, beyond hoping he gets the help he seems to desperately need. As for his “male feminist” act and the ire he drew from feminists, well, he brought that all on himself.

    It’s an object lesson for any man ever tempted to go from general beta white-knighting to full-on identification with feminists: they will at best be treated as side-show curiosities or tamed pets whose slightest transgressions will be swiftly punished.

    As for slutty women getting a pass? That’s not news. It’s one of the prime commandments of feminism: Thou Shalt Not Criticize Women for Anything, Ever.

    And I, too, am glad the kid is okay and on the mend.


  24. Hugh G. Rection August 7, 2013 at 15:21 #

    He can probably fit it easily in his belief system: I guess it’s just more proof to him that men are bad. He is bad, he is a man, so men are bad.


  25. L. August 13, 2013 at 22:36 #

    There is a BIG difference between 27 and 45! Most women are still very fertile in their late 20s/early 30s but are definitely NOT fertile at 45! Lumping women 27–45 all in one category for the UT study is painting with a rather broad brush no?


  26. JBfan September 16, 2013 at 14:23 #

    Personally, I enjoy seeing his downfall bar the mental problems (something nobody has control of so I wish you a speedy recovery Hugo if you see this). Other than that, I love seeing so-called self-proclaimed “male feminists” or “allies of feminism” humiliate themselves. The self-important sense of superiority complex and hypocritical lambasting of everything male through half-truths, distortions and downright lies, the sort of misery that pursued me without relief til I was 16 despite being innocent of any wrongdoing, only to see such morons disgrace and humiliate themselves totally and expose their own hypocrisy just fills me with joy. Kyle Payne of Iowa is another example, practising the very things he preaches against, that ironically, critics of feminism are repelled by, thus providing me with more ammo and proof that criticising feminism doesn’t make me a “misogynist” or “woman hater”.


  27. Erik Norén November 19, 2013 at 18:00 #

    Once in a millenium? From the stories i’ve seen of former feminists telling of their journey it’s more like once a year. Unless one is only counting the high feminists of course.



  1. Ideology and the modern Ba’al. | - Dark Brightness - August 3, 2013

    […] The Baal is a metaphor, but it is also an ancient religion of mystery, spirituality, and licence. Hypocrisy is standard. It will sacrifice allies for the good, and will sacrifice children, either in the womb or outside […]


  2. Wanna be a Male Feminist? Okay, here’s what you have to do | judgybitch - August 9, 2013

    […]… […]


  3. [!] JudgyBitch’s advice for feminist men[i-fe][b-fe][c-jt] | A Voice for Men - August 14, 2013

    […] friend Hugo Schwyzer has ignited quite the little debate with his departure from internet feminism, and the mantle of […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: