Yes Lena Dunham is a Sex Predator via A Voice for Men

5 Nov

Here is the article I wrote about the Lena Dunham sex abuse scandal. I wrote it exclusively for A Voice for Men and will post an excerpt and the link.

 

lena tweet

 

Kids “playing doctor” is pretty normal stuff. I am completely outraged when children are charged with felony offenses or end up on sex offender registriesor in sexual harassment classes for stuff that is perfectly innocent and normal. And of course those children are almost always boys. Even in preschool, boys are viewed by predominantly female staff and administration as predators and girls as innocent victims. It’s misandry, pure and simple. Grown women hating men so much that they will vilify, attack, and sanction little boys while giving little girls passes for the same behavior. My tweet came out of a desire to protect children from vindictive women and a few misguided men who see kindergarten boys planting kisses on the cheeks of classmates as sex predators.

 

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/yes-lena-dunham-is-a-sex-predator/

 

Hope you’ll head over and take a look.

 

Lots of love,

 

JB

39 Responses to “Yes Lena Dunham is a Sex Predator via A Voice for Men”

  1. yoursexymaster November 5, 2014 at 01:40 #

    I say skin the bitch

    Like

  2. Troy November 5, 2014 at 01:50 #

    and I fully retract that tweet. Well, not the part about Lena Dunham being a cunt, but the part about her not being a rapist.

    …..sigh…… I Love You.

    Like

  3. FuzzieWuzzie November 5, 2014 at 02:11 #

    Feminists must have egos so big that Tom Mix’s ten gallon hat would be too small. That Lena can go public with admissions so vile and can’t understand why people are put off, Is beyond vain. If I looked up “hubris” in the dictionary, would I find her picture?

    There’s something else that you may have already considered. She thrives on publicity in her occupation and her career has hit a node. I hope that these admissions are not red herrings. Should they be, she is fully responsible for their dissemination.

    Like

  4. farkennelf November 5, 2014 at 03:02 #

    While your at it miss judgybitch….see what germaine greer has to say about her taking photos of naked twelve year old boys while denouncing those who denounce folk who take pictures of twelve year old boys……dont hold back…….both barrels

    Like

  5. etmalthusianism November 5, 2014 at 04:20 #

    I would be in trouble if I was in school today. One of my earliest memories of school is the class of 5 year olds being marched up to the toilet blocks at the back of the school in 2 lines, one of boys and the other of girls. The girl next to me in the other line was to my 5 year old eyes a sight to behold; an angelic presence just 2 feet away from me. I was lost in staring. I was lost in a daydream. I was mesmerised by her beauty. She was radiant. She was what I imagined every fairytale princess to be.

    Suddenly the teacher made some sort of sarcastic remark and I woke up to see I was in a line by myself next to the girls’ line. The boys were in their line heading towards to boys toilet block and were a little distance away from me. I quickly made up the distance.

    Today that 5 year old boy would probably be counselled for his “misogynist” behaviour. Perhaps sent to a psychologist and put on drugs. That boy would certainly be shamed for some sort of “original sin”.

    Like

  6. That_Susan November 5, 2014 at 12:50 #

    I agree that it’s wrong for boys to be demonized and prosecuted and labeled as “predators” for behaviors that are seen as no big deal for girls to engage in. You’re right that a man who wrote so openly about the things you’ve quoted here would most likely be behind bars now.

    But I’m reminded of how someone here called me on my previous suggestion that women should have to register for the draft, too. Another poster, I can’t remember who now, made me see that NO ONE should have to register: we should just do away with that horrible practice entirely. Participation in the military should be voluntary.

    It’s horrendous for a boy to have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life for something he did when he was ten — but I don’t think it makes it any better to start treating girls the same way. In a sense, I wish that we (as a society) were able to have a rational discussion about child sexuality. I’m also in favor of ending the sex offender registry, because so many warped people use it as an excuse to inflict vigilante “justice” by making life miserable for ex-convicts and their families. I haven’t heard of any evidence that it deters crime at all; it only increases it.

    One thing that currently stands out to my teen daughter, who is a lesbian, is that there are a good number of people who don’t believe sex between women qualifies as sex. They feel there has to be a penis for it to be sex. In a way, this view is both misogynistic AND misandric — it means that the presence of a male is essential for anything to qualify as a sex act, but also that no male present = no sex act = no possibility for it to ever result in a rape accusation.

    Like

  7. Master Beta November 5, 2014 at 14:42 #

    I remember desperately vying for the affection of a girl, to no avail, when I was in nursery (3/4 years old then). The adults tried to get me to leave her alone with some success.
    I shudder to think how I would have been treated had I been born more recently.

    Like

  8. Master Beta November 5, 2014 at 15:01 #

    That’s why I hate how “equality” has become some noble goal that people think we should be aspiring to.
    You can achieve equality between two peoples in two ways: You can help one of them, or you can hurt the other. And one of these ways is much easier than the other.

    Like

  9. That_Susan November 5, 2014 at 15:11 #

    Exactly.

    Like

  10. That_Susan November 5, 2014 at 15:14 #

    I mean, I agree with the second part of your post — but I’m also in favor of aspiring to equality — only with a focus on lifting up the disadvantaged group rather than knocking down the advantaged one.

    Like

  11. George Makedon November 5, 2014 at 18:52 #

    Hi perky Susan ! New neighbourhood – same house ! ( the chamber of Feminist horrors ) . . Terribly sorry for my delay ( extremely tight schedule) , but I think this new tag/theme is excellent opportunity for catching up , and quite relevant – rather very relevant – to what we were discussing recently . God willing , tomorrow ” I’ll be back” . Meanwhile , since you’ve declared your self a “Christian” – albeit not a “fundamentalist” one – would you care to check the virgin and martyr St.Suzanna’s life ? p.s. ” Lesbian – Homosexual sex , IS sex ( that’s the point actually ) , BUT a – pathological – one .” Dr.Robert Parloff – former Director of A.P.A .

    Like

  12. George Makedon November 5, 2014 at 19:12 #

    Clarification : when I say “same house /feminist chamber of horrors” , I don’t mean of course this excellent site , but the ” hub of horrors” , that J.B (bless her) , tries – superhumanly- to demolish or expose .

    Like

  13. That_Susan November 5, 2014 at 19:46 #

    I honestly don’t recall ever declaring myself a Christian here. I believe Christianity was my first connection with love and spirituality outside my family — but as I’ve matured, I’ve learned that this love and spiritual connection is available to anyone of any belief system. I experience answers to my prayers now, just as I did as a fundamentalist Christian.

    I’ve just read a brief history of St. Susanna, and I think it’s cool that her family supported her in her refusal of the marriage proposal. As far as her vow of virginity, I think people have a right to remain virgins if they want — and also to have sex if they want, but only with another person who’s capable of giving consent and who actually wants to have sex with them, of course.

    As far as the need you seem to feel to define one way of expressing love as “pathological” — I disagree. I actually see the condemnation of same-sex romance and marriage as pathological. In the sexual area, the only thing I see as pathological is one person forcing themselves sexually on another, which of course also includes taking advantage of anyone who’s incapable of giving consent for any reason. I don’t see loving sex as something that one person does to another, but as a mutual act; as long as there’s mutuality, there’s no pathology.

    Like

  14. George Makedon November 5, 2014 at 21:35 #

    Very briefly : They ALWAYS use plastic penises , didn’t you know that ? Don’t you find it absurd ? And they call them ” toys” , as in another way of demeaning men and make them obsolete and irrelevant . When you were a young girl did you aspire to use replicas of man’s geniitalia and call them “toys” ? “That” evil ?

    Like

  15. George Makedon November 5, 2014 at 21:39 #

    I am reffering of course to your 12.50 post .

    Like

  16. That_Susan November 5, 2014 at 22:28 #

    I don’t personally involve myself in how any other couple wants to have sex. It IS evil to treat another human being as obsolete — but I for one don’t assume that two gay men are treating me as obsolete when they have sex with each other. I don’t NEED every man in the world to have sex with me; I just have one husband, and that’s plenty.

    I would, however, feel like I was being treated as obsolete if no one thought I had anything of value to offer the world because of my age, appearance, or gender. People can show me that they value me by doing things like respectfully listening to my ideas and giving me an equal chance to do a job. It’s seriously okay if they’d rather have sex with someone else.

    Like

  17. Kas November 6, 2014 at 01:03 #

    The media spent a few days trying to run interference for Dunham. JB, they printed the “pebble” excerpt as if it was the only the Kevin Williamson was talking about when he made his allegations. Surprisingly, people overwhelmingly were repulsed and after she threatened legal action for printing her own words verbatim, the media just seemed to give up.

    Like

  18. myyhago November 6, 2014 at 02:08 #

    Ant radfem sites that can be recommended so I can go read them justify how the twat isn’t a pedophile? I was reading feminist current and Megan Murphy got lenas back. I always find hypocrites like that tragically amusing.

    Like

  19. Magnus November 6, 2014 at 08:06 #

    I think the idea here is that you highlight an issue, in order for people to understand that maybe it’s being handled wrong.

    As with the draft, you have the following algorithm in place:

    IF
    Need draft to sustain sufficient military for protection
    AND
    You have equality
    THEN
    Both sexes must sign up for draft.
    ELSE
    You don’t have equality
    ELSE IF
    You don’t need draft
    THEN
    Abolish draft, and get equality.

    But being against female draft because you are against the draft in general doesn’t help the men who have to sign up. Unless you work to abolish it.

    Like

  20. That_Susan November 6, 2014 at 11:46 #

    Very true.

    Like

  21. George Makedon November 7, 2014 at 05:13 #

    They wouldn’t do that though , to a boy with homosexual tendensy would they ? On the other hand rarely someone sees homosexual tendencies in that age and THAT is also very telling !

    Like

  22. George Makedon November 7, 2014 at 05:24 #

    You SHOULD involve yourself because we are talking about your daughter and her predicament , remember ?

    Like

  23. That_Susan November 7, 2014 at 12:43 #

    What are you talking about — your obsession over how various couples do it? You think parents should involve themselves in their children’s sex lives, when those young people reach the point of being ready to connect that intimately with another person?

    I think the time to be involved is when they are young — by listening, answering questions, and making sure they have all the resources they need to make informed choices. By the time they are ready to actually do it, they seriously don’t want their parents in the room with them.

    I’ve never talked with my own mom about how my husband and I do it, although we did talk openly about sex when I was young and had questions.

    Like

  24. George Makedon November 8, 2014 at 20:17 #

    Predicament I said ! ( Dr.Robert Parloff Ph.d . – former Director of A.P.A ). . . Meanwhile forgive me for any linguistic mistakes, slips, sic’s etc. as English is not my first language . So listen . . they are STILL young ! She “came out” when . . at 13 perhaps ? what did you do about it ? You applaud it because of YOUR obssesion with the “civilized” paranoid – everything goes- Cu.HEx (Culture of Human Excrement ) ? You are out of bounds dear !A victim of corruption – to put it mildly- and you transfer this unwillingly ofcourse, around you . You STILL have time regarding your daughter, and she does’t know what she’s doing for God’s sake . Meanwhile YOU ARE very conserned , but in total wrong ways , imposed ofcourse by the prevailing social lesbo-feminist rot. .Meanwhile the other time , I show at B.b.c. an excellent discussion with an American scientist called Joseph Nicolozi . I believe he does an EXCELLENT job in healing these conditions , which in your daughter’s case I don’t even think is even seriously formed yet . Wake up ! No Civilization , Religion or School of Thought for the last 40.000 years ever accepted Homosexuality as normal or “healthy” . Even Satanism and Occult practices rejoiced in it PRECISELY because it was a perversion . Is your ‘measuring stick’ “mutual acceptance” ? But this is a procrustian ,idiotic and barbaric approach . So under this context , with the proper “mutual consent” , YOU could marry in couple of years your daughter , and better still your “hubby” the other one, in the “appropriate” time ofcourse ! Lol ! How about that ? Are you shoked ? Ofcourse you are . But the diabolical is not only perseived according to your outer bounds received choises and defences , but globally and “through out ” as an ingrained sensibility .Therefore I am equally shoked ( and the majority of Planet earth is ) in the mere thought of Homosexual “marriage” . Did it EVER existed and if not , why not ? I’d love to know what your -criminally complacent – “hubby” WHO IS THE GENITOR , has to say about this . Is he having the time of his life with ‘perky Suzan’, while ushers his “flesh and blood” -maiden Daughter- in a life of evil cohabitation with dormant vaginas , or lonely spinsterhood , where she will giggle like an idiot during the day and cry herself to sleep at night ? And what about dr. Robert Parloff ? He revelead that the only reason A.P.A. altered the definition of Homosexuality as a disorder-disease , during 80’s was the constant harassment and terrorist threats by the H.lobbys , social activists and Goverment policies . So don’t be criminally egotistical , get your facts together and dont comply into something , that deep in your heart know is not right .

    Like

  25. George Makedon November 8, 2014 at 20:38 #

    St. Archangel’s Michael day . . with spiritual love .

    Like

  26. That_Susan November 9, 2014 at 13:24 #

    I don’t “applaud” anyone for being gay or straight — but I do applaud my daughter for never seeing any reason to fake being straight just because most of her friends are. You’re right that she’s young; she’s free to keep learning about herself and about life as she goes through it. However, I think you’re sadly misinformed if you believe teenagers know absolutely nothing about their own sexual orientations.

    You accuse me of raising my daughter with a “procrustean, idiotic, and barbaric approach.” Idiotic means stupid; barbaric means either cruel or unsophisticated (I looked it up just to refresh my knowledge) — so I get that because I disagree with you, you assume that I’m stupid; and if by “barbaric,” you mean “unsophisticated,” I guess that goes-in-hand with calling me stupid. But if by “barbaric,” you mean “cruel,” then I guess you’re saying that REAL KINDNESS towards an LGBT person is supposed to LOOK LIKE cruelty — thus the fact that I love and accept her just as she is serves as evidence to you that I’m a real monster.

    Like many of my clients who don’t speak English as a first language, you’ve exposed me to a new word in English — “procrustean.” I had to look that one up, and it’s still a puzzle to me. After all, you’ve just accused me of being a bad parent because I’m willing to accept something about my child that diverges from the norm, and you’ve even recommended a scientist whom you believe can “heal” gays and lesbians of one of the things that makes them different. Are you sure it’s not a case of the pot calling the kettle black?

    From Wikipedia: “In Greek mythology, Procrustes (Προκρούστης) or “the stretcher [who hammers out the metal]”, also known as Prokoptas or Damastes (Δαμαστής) “subduer”, was a rogue smith and bandit from Attica who physically attacked people by stretching them or cutting off their legs, so as to force them to fit the size of an iron bed. In general, when something is Procrustean, different lengths or sizes or properties are fitted to an arbitrary standard.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procrustes 

    Like

  27. That_Susan November 9, 2014 at 13:39 #

    Correction: When quoting people, I like to copy their words and punctuation exactly, and I see now that I failed to do that in my previous post. I quoted you as saying that I had a “procrustean, idiotic, and barbaric approach,” when what you’d really said was that I had a “procrustian ,idiotic and barbaric approach .”

    Like

  28. George Makedon November 9, 2014 at 21:25 #

    What’s wrong with you Suzanna ? Why are you avoiding the “elephant in the room ” ? No.1) :Dr. Robert Parloff . 2) I saluted you with spiritual greetings of Love for yesterday’s Archangel’s Michael and all Angels feast day as I am an Orthodox Christian and we don’t usually deal in hate – only in rage – that is , when it is “appropriate” . Therefore I might “feel” more for Homosexuals than you , as very wisely Putin of Russia said recently . ( I am not Russian ). And by the way my favorite holiday spot is the island of Mykonos in Greece , the known vacational spot for Jet set celebrities , as well as Lgbt’s popular destination . But offcourse that doesn’t mean that , either I associate ‘cordially’ with them, or approve of their tragic ‘arrested development’ and their hineous attempt to glorify , propagate and consequently MUTATE -as never before- the -set in stone – two genre’s characteristics , with their finally preposterous ambition to call their PATHOLOGICAL unions “marriages” – a subject which ofcourse goes hand in hand with the always assisting, Occultist oriented Feminism . 3) You are NOT a bad parent , as you are obviously concerned about your children BUT you are -egotistically – influenced by the TERRIBLE trends in place, which are as I stressed , in total disregard with the total GLOBAL Human Historical experience and paradigms . . (and for a reason ) . 4) ‘Healing’ IT IS , and as dr. Joseph Nicolossi stressed in the interview I watched , it is achivable precisely because it deals with a disease-disorder . Particularly that is , with early ages as your daughter’s , with which very wrongly you give unesessary gravitas . Futhermore another indicative factor that I personally noticed ( I may be wrong ) , is that rarely these tendensies manifest in todlers , which is very TELLING , despite ofcourse the Diabolical Lesbo-feminist orriented approach against Heterosexuality -as well as Motherhood – which starts now from Kindergarden onwards (as brilliantly is presented by this main article) , with the moronic crimminal appeasement of the otherways “concerned” parents . 5) “Procrustean” usually reffers to metaphoric -barbaric- mentality of “equality” where -everything- has to be streached or eliminated in order to meet “current” standards . And as a holy Father said once : ” usually behind “equality” (and Egotism I may add) looms the Devil himself ” which is offcource entirely a different matter and concept than what JUSTICE stands for .

    Like

  29. George Makedon November 9, 2014 at 22:03 #

    2) A last thought on American women . . like you . My opinion is – as I mentioned it before – that generally, American women are very gifted – that is very attractive , well natured , good willed , eager to please , innocent (in a good way) , positive etc., BUT ultra-gullible , I repeat ULTRA GULLIBLE, and that’s why they were the first to fall into the current social Holocust

    Like

  30. farkennel November 10, 2014 at 07:36 #

    FREE LENA!!!…T shirts available at Ellens credibility…printed by Oprah….. GET THEM WHILE THERE HOT!!!

    Like

  31. farkennel November 10, 2014 at 08:11 #

    Oh my Oh my…Ellen and Oprah will elevate the child molester….sorry.. the older sister of the attacker of heteronormative abuse….and Judgy Bitch…I`m guessing…will say negative things…Ellen and Oprah will be outraged(relative to the ratings)…….this doesnt sound right….I blame judgy bitch….go find other things to occupy your time…no wonder they call you judgy….LEAVE LENA ALONE! THE Oprah will protect you Lena,it`s just one of those bad hair days where a shiela like judgy bitch has enough influence to ask the question……LEAVE LENA ALONE!… dont listen to me I`m thinking out loud…big red rejected my marriage proposal…I`m not thinking right..all marriage proposals that are rejected hurt….`specially from big red…I thought she was my “special” gal…….I hurt…

    Like

  32. That_Susan November 10, 2014 at 11:49 #

    Well, I’ve googled and haven’t been able to find ANYTHING saying that Oprah and Ellen are supporting Dunham regarding this. If this is the case, can you provide links?

    Like

  33. farkennel November 10, 2014 at 20:14 #

    Ellen has had this creep on her show and all of Ellens acolytes….brainless to an individual(go to her youtube place)say nice things …I will put money on THE OPRAH making Lena a saint….give it time.Unless it becomes too hot a ratings potato and all her woes cant be blamed on her father,Ellen and THE OPRAH will be patting the victim Lena on the back big time…..mark my words.

    Like

  34. That_Susan November 10, 2014 at 22:05 #

    Okay, I’ll wait and see — but I know Oprah has a pretty strong stance against child abuse.

    Like

  35. emmatheemo November 11, 2014 at 03:38 #

    Yeah, lets charge her, also drag Grace Dunham through court procedures (whether she likes it or not, whether she feels harmed by it, or not – not feeling harmed is just a sign she was deeply traumatized anyway). After all, they won’t stop charging boys until we burn girls so hard that they give up.

    Like

  36. That_Susan November 11, 2014 at 12:21 #

    In most states, neither a man nor a woman could be prosecuted in this case because it’s been more than seven years (in some states, they have to file their claim within two or three years) — but I looked into New York’s laws and since Grace is not 24 yet, it looks like she could file charges if she wanted to. I don’t think any victim should be forced against their will to testify in court — but in this case, I suppose the state could file charges and the book itself might be all the evidence needed.

    While I personally see prison as largely useless as a means of deterring crime, I suppose its only use might be in preventing the molester access to any kids, at least while they’re locked up. In Lena’s case, virtually every parent now knows about her past and can make their own determination as to whether they’d trust her with their child.

    As far as the sex offender registry, I’ve yet to see any evidence that it deters crime; it seems to actually increase crime as some sick people see it as their calling to hunt ex-convicts down and make their lives, and their families’ lives, miserable. In Lena’s case, I don’t think anyone’s ever likely to lose track of her anyway.

    Janet’s point is that feminists would have responded much more harshly to this book if it had been written by a man. I think she’s right — don’t you? I mean, just imagine if Rush Limbaugh had written something like that?

    Link on statute of limitations:

    http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/state-civil-statutes-of-limitations-in-child-sexua.aspx

    Like

  37. Alethea November 30, 2014 at 03:35 #

    What took place, was not “mutual sexual play” or two children “exploring themselves,” or “curiosity.”

    Lena Dunham wrote about her sister’s vagina and her obsession with it, as if she is still fantasizing about the child’s anatomy.

    She wrote about spreading open the child’s vagina, who was seven years younger than she was (there is a strong probability that Lena put those pebbles in the one year-old’s vagina, not the toddler). Lena writes about the moment: “I leaned down between her legs and carefully spread open her vagina, she didn’t resist…”

    “She didn’t resist…” Words of a pedophile.

    She also wrote about masturbating -until age 17- with the child in bed next to her…and she used words that are titillating and that describe what might be found in the mind of any sexual predator of children:

    ”Her sticky, muscly little body thrashed beside me every night.” (while Lena masturbated)

    Lena Dunham is a child sexual abuser, who openly admitted in her book, that she did to her little sister, “basically anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl.”

    Lena wrote about bribing her little sister, seven years her junior, for kisses on the lips and bribed the child to get her to “relax” on top of Lena. She wrote how she used psychological manipulation of the younger child:

    “ I shared a bed with my sister, Grace, until I was seventeen years old. She was afraid to sleep alone and would begin asking me around 5:00 P.M. every day whether she could sleep with me. I put on a big show of saying no, taking pleasure in watching her beg and sulk, but eventually I always relented. Her sticky, muscly little body thrashed beside me every night.”

    Lena Dunhma took pleasure in watching the younger child be rejected, knowing full well that she would “always relent” and ‘allow’ the child to sleep with her, while Lena masturbated.

    Sexual predators do these kind of things to children, and Lena Dunham relished in the desire to have the younger child sleep with her.

    How do we know she took pleasure in it, and wanted her sister sleeping with her?

    “As [Grace] grew, I took to bribing her for her time and affection: one dollar in quarters if I could do her makeup like a ‘motorcycle chick.’ Three pieces of candy if I could kiss her on the lips for five seconds. Whatever she wanted to watch on TV if she would just ‘relax on me.’ Basically, anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying.Maybe, I thought, she would be more willing to accept kisses if I wore the face mask my grandmother had for when she did her dialysis. (The answer was no.) What I really wanted, beyond affection, was to feel that she needed me, that she was helpless without her big sister leading her through the world. I took a perverse pleasure in delivering bad news to her— the death of our grandfather, a fire across the street —hoping that her fear would drive her into my arms, would make her trust me.”

    Lena Dunham posted a photo on Instagram, about a year ago, of her then five year-old sister wearing make-up, fake breasts, and “bad girl motorcycle chick” written on her tee-shirt. Lena posted the photo with the caption
    “that time I dressed my 5 year old sister as a Hell’s Angel’s sex property,”

    Five year-old children are NOT “sex property,” and the photo shows an innocent five year-old girl, being forced to do what her older sister wants her to do, in order to gratify her older sister’s sexual attraction to children,and to make a child out to be a sexual object. It is a snapshot of a five year-old child being psychologically abused.

    That photo should be considered child pornography, especially in light of Dunham’s recent personal revelations in her new book.

    Lena Dunham is getting away with her sexual deviancy, and she is being glorified and excused by most of the mainstream press, by many women, and by many feminists, because she is a white female entertainer, who is popular among feminists and women who like the fact that Dunham is not embarrassed about herself and what she represents on her HBO show, “Girls.”

    That show should be cancelled. You can sign the petition here: https://www.change.org/p/hbo-end-contract-with-lena-dunham

    Like

  38. farkennel December 6, 2014 at 05:00 #

    It isnt child abuse if its committed by a darling of feminism.

    Like

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Yes Lena Dunham is a Sex Predator via A Voice for Men | Manosphere.com - November 5, 2014

    […] Yes Lena Dunham is a Sex Predator via A Voice for Men […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: