Tag Archives: Hugo schwyzer

Slutty feminist WOMEN with fucked up personal lives are heroes. Slutty feminist MEN with fucked up personal lives are mentally ill traitors. Really now, Hugo, you didn’t see this coming?

3 Aug

It’s interesting to me to see the compassionate response the complete meltdown of male feminist Hugo Schwyzer has elicited from the very men he has repeatedly attacked for their supposed “misogyny” and hatred of women.


Paul Elam at A Voice for Men expresses his sorrow at the mess Hugo has found himself in, and places enormous truth value on Hugo’s claims that he suffers from a fairly serious mental health problem.

To be completely honest, for the first time I actually feel sympathy for this troubled soul. His unchecked sociopathy and childlike lack of governance over his base impulses have led him to a place few gender ideologues will ever go: To simultaneous personal and professional destruction.


William Pierce at The Spearhead has similar thoughts:  Hugo has some crazy in his pants, and while Pierce doesn’t demonstrate quite the compassion that Paul does, he takes the prospect of Schwyzer being suicidal quite seriously, although he is quick to place the responsibility right where it belongs. Fair enough.  Men do commit suicide at alarmingly high rates that amount to a national healthcare crisis.

Finally, I’d like to point out how topsy-turvy things are when we have male feminists fooling around with porn stars and flying to Ukraine (Lord knows what Hugo was up to there) while manosphere writers cause scandals by settling down in monogamous relationships. It’s a crazy world out there…

Hugo, when you behave in this manner, it isn’t your critics who are causing your problems: it’s you.


I’m not criticizing any man who lines up behind Hugo, or demonstrates empathy or concern.  In fact, it’s a pretty terrific example of exactly how NOT cold-hearted and quasi-violent men who question feminist ideology are towards those who routinely attempt to shame them into silence.


When a man is hurting, other men at least pause to consider that someone here is hurting.

That’s a pretty beautiful sentiment.

When it comes to Hugo, I don’t share it.  Not for one second.  I think Hugo is being a total pussy and missing out on a fantastic opportunity to point out the fucking hypocrisy of the ideology he has thrown himself behind professionally and personally.

step off

What Hugo should be saying is “Step off, bitches.  You do the same shit and spin it as liberation and freedom. My personal life is none of your goddamn business”.

Let’s start with the Grande Dame of feminism herself:  Simone de Beauvoir.  She supposedly had an “open relationship” with Jean Paul Sartre, and she pursued him for her entire life.


Yet in this lifelong relationship of supposed equals, he, it turned out, was far more equal than she was. It was he who engaged in countless affairs, to which she responded on only a few occasions with longer-lasting passions of her own. Between the lines of her fiction and what are in effect six volumes of autobiography, it is also evident that De Beauvoir suffered deeply from jealousy. She wanted to keep the image of a model life intact. There were no children. They never shared a house and their sexual relations were more or less over by the end of the war, though for much of their life and certainly at the last, they saw each other daily.


Is de Beauvoir a pathetic simpleton who can’t get it through her head that her cheating genius will never, ever ruck up with a ring and a dress?  Is she mentally ill to allow her life to be dictated by a man who openly sleeps with other women while she seethes at home alone with jealousy?  Does anyone question her feminism because she plays the role of the dupe?  All her passions governed by one man, whom she cannot have?

Nope.  She’s a goddamn hero.


Erica Jong launched sluttiness as a virtue in 1971 with her book Fear of Flying.  Married four times, she reveled in the fuck and run mentality.

“The zipless fuck is absolutely pure. It is free of ulterior motives. There is no power game . The man is not “taking” and the woman is not “giving.” No one is attempting to cuckold a husband or humiliate a wife. No one is trying to prove anything or get anything out of anyone. The zipless fuck is the purest thing there is. And it is rarer than the unicorn. And I have never had one.”

The book is one long erotic fantasy of just grabbing and banging whatever guy gets your motor running, and women embraced the challenge rather thoroughly, all the while lauding Jong for her audacity and the liberating effects of zipless, no strings attached fucking.

Eat, Love, Pray?  Hell yeah, ladies, ditch your husband and kids and go on a sex and food tour.  It’s good for you!


Sex and the City?  Ladies, if you are not cultivating greed, avarice, tons of stupidly expensive shoes and bedposts notched to toothpicks, you are doing feminism WRONG!


…to dismiss the programme entirely on the basis of its shortcomings as a feminist text would also be to lose out on what it does deliver. Just to take the most headline-grabbing example, that includes some pretty frank discussion of sex, in which female sexual pleasure and agency is obviously considered a fundamental right, rather than a privilege.


Ladies, you have a fundamental right to be a slut!  Okay, I’ll buy it.

Why don’t men have the same fundamental right?  Why doesn’t Hugo?

Granted, Hugo has been a bad, bad boy.


Sex with undergrads.


A botched attempt to murder a girlfriend while high on who the hell knows what.


Cheating on his wife with a 27 year old sex worker.  NSFW.



All the while railing against older men lusting after younger women.


And cheering for monogamy.


Yeah, so Hugo is a giant fucking hypocrite.  This is news?  The real question is why, Hugo, do your lady friends get a pass for all their shitty behavior without anyone questioning their ideological commitment or veracity, while you are driven to the brink of suicide by doing the exact same shit?

Riddle me that.

Sex with students?  When the teacher is a woman, that’s just all good fun!


“There is still a double standard out there, and it’s almost a joke — ‘Hey, he got hit on by some pretty teacher, what’s he complaining about?’ ” said Ramsland, who has worked with the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit. “Many don’t see it as much of a crime, and one of the factors that women are getting off easier is some don’t see them as a big of a threat as a man.


Getting a pass for attempted murder?  There are too many to even cite, but I love this woman who hired a HITMAN (who was really a police officer) to kill her husband and she got the full out pussy pass.  No penalty of any kind.

Women’s justice groups are urging the Supreme Court to stand by a decision that acquitted a Nova Scotia woman for trying to hire a hit man to kill her estranged husband due to years of abuse.

The abuse was so severe the husband was awarded custody of their daughter.  Must have been really bad, right?  Or complete and utter bullshit.


Older women lusting after younger men?  Why, that’s just natural!  All that young, virile sperm.  And the muscle tone of a young man!  Ooh, baby.  Bring it on.


As women decline in fertility, their sex drive gets a supercharge in order to maximize their remaining baby-making chances, new research from the University of Texas at Austin reveals. Women in the low-fertility group (ages 27-45) were much more likely to report having more sex, wanting more sex, and having more (and more intense) sexual fantasies. “If you’re trying to maximize your remaining fertility, it makes sense to seek out a younger partner because his sperm is healthier,” says lead researcher Judith Easton.


And monogamy?  What’s that?  Why should women embrace that dreary old shit?  I particularly love this story, plastered everywhere, about how Simon Cowell knocked up his best friend’s wife!  She is apparently delighted to have snagged the BabyMama Crown from the grasping hands of the other members of the Aching Ovaries Brigade.



None of these issues, or women, are being called out on feminist media sites. Nothing to see here.  La la la la.  The top stories on Jezebel?

What to do with your slobbery drunk friends?  Fuck ‘em, is basically the advice. Gosh.  Lovely to see women lining up in each other’s corners, no?


What to do when your period is so heavy you can’t go to work!  Jesus.  How heavy does it have to be? What is your job?  Shark tamer?



Lindy West, who gets bigger with every new post, had a breastmilk lollipop.  Ewww. Do you have suck everything that comes near your mouth, Lindy?  Really?  No limits at all?


The rest of the stories are just as compelling.  Jezebel has lots to say, but very little of it focuses on the issues that Hugo is being excoriated for all over the feminist media.

Hugo, ask yourself why.  Why is it that WOMEN get a pass for doing all the same shit you do, or at the very least are met with some pretty deafening silence, while YOU are basically being deprived of your ability to make a living or contribute to society in a way that you want to contribute.

Notice something else, too.

Look carefully at who came to your defence.  It wasn’t the pack of fucking bitches who are willing to toss you under the bus for committing the exact same infractions they extol when women are the protagonists.

It was men.  And a few men in particular.


You’re a fool, Hugo, if you cave into the demands that you present yourself as mentally damaged, in need of medications and self-flagellation.  Your lady friends might forgive you this time, but you will always walk that tightrope of being barely acceptable and you will always be the first one they sacrifice.

You went to the Dark Side in search of cookies, Hugo, not seeming to realize that feminists HATE cookies.


Come into the light.  We have cookies, and everything else too!


Start here.


And please, whatever you do, do not give them the satisfaction of destroying you utterly.  They won’t mourn you.  Not for one second. Don’t become another tragic statistic.  Your crimes were not crimes at all.  Being human is not a crime.

Even if you happen to be male and human at the same time.

Lots of love,


[We all survived the surgery, just so you know, and everyone is happy and healthy back at home]

NSFW! Mr. JB, pick up some lube on your way home. We’re gonna solve the problem of sexism! It will be fun. Trust me.

2 Mar

OMG this is almost too much too handle. Jesus Christ, where to start?

Let’s start here:

This is Hugo Schwyzer.



He is a “feminist ally” (keep that in mind for later) who writes for Jezebel, and his current contribution to that cesspool makes cesspools seem like delicately scented bubble baths.


Trigger warning: if you thought some of my previous shit was crass and sordid, today is gonna blow your mind.

Can we just stop for a moment to talk about “trigger warnings”? Those things piss me off because they are just so damn hypocritical and outright insulting to women. You wanna talk misogyny? Let’s talk trigger warnings.

I tend to think of women as rational, intelligent, sane creatures who are capable of facing challenges and adversity and demonstrating some resilience and strength and basically just being adults who can get through life without everything being sunshine and rainbows all the damn time. I don’t think women are overly emotional, fragile, delicate flowers who must be protected, at all costs, from every little hardship that comes along.

But that is just what trigger warnings claim: women are so emotionally fragile and so ruled by their emotions that even confronting the horror of words on a page will cause them to collapse into sobbing piles of uselessness and despair.


And these are the same people who want women in positions of decision-making and authority? If you need a trigger warning to protect yourself from becoming the emotional cripple you so clearly ARE, how in the hell are you going to be an effective leader of others? Leadership requires confidence and endurance and stamina and strength and the ability to persevere through setbacks and opposition and outright hostility, and you can’t even read the words “eating disorder” without Prozac and a warning?

Jesus, ladies, pick one! You’re either capable and confident and perfectly able to manage your own emotions, or you are incompetent, unable to control your emotional reactions and suffer from such a crushing lack of self-esteem that words on a page will reduce you to a snivelling sack of useless shit.

“Trigger warning” will have a whole new meaning if women end up in combat. Let’s see how the ladies like that.

Is this why feminists tend to be fat? It must be. All that cake they’re having and still an endless supply because they eat and eat and eat and still get to have it, too.


All right then, let’s get to today’s rant.

So Hugo, our little manly friend up top, begins with the premise that men suck. That’s required for publication at Jezebel. No big surprise there. I wonder if Hugo knows he’s a man?

He starts by talking about our deeply misogynistic culture, in which women have

the absolute right to determine whether they will become parents,

the right to force men to pay for their choices,

the right to attend a publicly funded school system designed around their strengths and interests,

the right to live in a country whose freedom is protected with male lives,

the right to define any sexual experience as rape if they feel like it was and then subsequently have their male partners jailed,

the right to be assumed the custodian of children when marriages break down,

the right to sue for equal pay for unequal labor, effort or training,

the right to have their healthcare issues funded,

the right to receive lenient or no punishment for criminal offences and

the right to have sex for money if they so choose.


Oh wait. No, they don’t have that last right. All those feminists speaking out against prostitution? Yeah, that’s misogyny.

Deeply misogynist culture?!?!?! Are you fucking kidding me? Hey, Hugo, ever hear of a place called Saudi Arabia? How about Afghanistan? Ring a bell? No?

You know we’re heading nowhere good when we start out with that premise, but I’ll bet you can’t guess just how bad it’s gonna get.

Here is Hugo’s plan for how to fix our “deeply misogynist” culture: we need to get men to be more compassionate, appreciative and playful. What we want is men who are incredibly secure in their masculinity and who are not threatened by women. We want men liberated from the straightjacket of masculinity, with happy consequences for everyone. We want men to be “feminist allies”.






No silly. That’s not how you liberate men from the straightjacket of masculinity. You see, we still NEED men to fight wars and do all the rough, dirty, shitty work in our culture and then to go and quietly kill themselves or die from preventable diseases when they are no longer useful. We’re not talking about that kind of straightjacket.

No, the correct way to liberate men from masculinity and to make them more compassionate, appreciative and playful is….

Are you ready?




Yes, gentlemen, anal sex is how you liberate yourself from masculinity and become more compassionate, appreciative and playful. And not just ANY anal sex. No, no, no. This kind of anal sex is very specific: you must let your wife or girlfriend penetrate your ass with a strap-on penis.


Delightful name, no?

Now simmer down, all you non-anal sex loving heterosexual men. If you don’t care to be pegged by your girlfriend or your wife, it’s because you are insecure in your masculinity, homophobic and also just a really bad sexual partner.


Here’s why you need to open your mind to having a giant silicon dick shoved up your ass:

…no other erotic experience a man can undergo can create greater empathy with women than being penetrated by his partner. “For men who have never been on the receiving side of penetration, sex is something that happens outside the body. And when sex is external to your body, it can be easier to do when you have a headache or you’re not quite in the mood. A lot of men discover than when sex is about catching rather than pitching, their mood, their emotions, and their connection to a partner can often have a bigger influence on what they want to do and how it feels.” Men, Glickman and Emirzian suggest optimistically, will be a lot less likely to rush foreplay once they’ve experienced how long it takes to relax sufficiently in order to comfortably take a dildo (or other sex toy) in the ass.


So basically this is about lack of foreplay? Really? Wouldn’t it be easier to, oh, I don’t know, JUST ASK your partner to slow things down than to get out a dildo and fuck him up the ass?

You know, I actually don’t think this is about foreplay at all. Here’s the most interesting part of the article:

“There’s a common myth that anal sex only hurts the receiver,” they say; it’s too often assumed (especially when it’s a man doing the penetrating) that he’s taking pleasure in causing discomfort, while the “bottom” (usually a woman) gets pleasure only out of making her guy happy. “We suspect this is also why some straight guys may fear that their female partners want to penetrate them not for mutual pleasure, but as some kind of passive-aggressive payback.”

Uhm, have any of these writers ever seen a real penis? They seem to be leaving out something pretty significant: PENISES CONNECTED TO REAL LIVING MEN HAVE NERVE ENDINGS. When a real, flesh and blood, living penis enters a vagina or an anus or a mouth, those nerve endings are activated and result in a feeling of extreme pleasure.

When a woman straps on a silicon penis and shoves it up her partner’s ass, SHE DOESN’T FEEL ANYTHING because plastic dicks do not contain nerve endings! How in the name of god could fucking someone with a plastic dick be conceived of as MUTUALLY pleasurable?

Why, the authors answer their own question, don’t they?

It most certainly IS a passive-aggressive payback. There is no potential for physical pleasure from the act of pegging a man – IT’S A FAKE PENIS! The pleasure comes from humiliating him. The pleasure comes from dominating him. The pleasure comes from turning him into a woman, however temporarily.

And you know, I have no problem with men who enjoy this kind of thing. You like getting fucked in the ass by your girlfriend’s strap-on? Have at ‘er, lads. It’s none of my business what turns your crank.


Let’s take a look at the last sentences of the article: … the sooner men get over their anxiety and guilt, the more fun they and their partners will have. And maybe, just maybe, we can peg our way right out of sexism itself.

The more fun men will have? Really? So now it’s fun to surrender your body so that someone else can feel aggressive and dominant and psychologically satisfied by an act that delivers no physical pleasure to her? Gee, it seems to me that when MEN engage in sexual acts that require women to be submissive and that result in no physical pleasure for her, they are sexist, inconsiderate assholes who deserve a lonely life of masturbating to internet porn.

You want to come on my face? Fuck off, asshole.


But when women want to do that exact same thing to men, it’s not only understandable, laudable and acceptable, it’s a potential solution to the whole problem of sexism itself! All we need to end sexism is to degrade men to the point where they will happily offer their asses for pounding.

All right, I’m game. Let’s end sexism, Mr. JB. You’re not homophobic, right? You care about me, right? You want to end sexism, right? You want to be appreciative and playful, right?

Of course you do. So turn over, honey. Let’s get this thing done.

You don’t mind if I fart while I fuck you up the ass, do you?


Oh good. I’m only human.

Lots of love,


Entitled bitch gets cheated on. Can’t believe the ugly little fucker would do that!

19 Dec

So Hugo Schwyzer, writing at Jezebel, attempts today to explain to all the hot ladies that the little trolls they are dating are (surprise!) just as likely to cheat in their relationship as hot guys.


“I’m a 7. He’s a 4. How could he cheat on me?”, asks Betsy. “My calculus did involve his not being super-attractive,” she admitted; “at least partly because of how he looked, I took his fidelity for granted.”

Oh, wow. OK, Betsy. I’m going to clue you in on why your little hobgoblin boyfriend cheated on you: it’s because you’re a cunt. And not just a garden variety cunt. A full-blown, self-entitled, narcissistic, snotty, full of yourself cunt. In fact, calling you a cunt may actually be insulting cunts, for which I apologize profusely. #sorrycunts


Women like Betsy, who is 36 by the way, are in for such a rude awakening as time marches on. Newsflash, Betsy: Beauty fades. And once it does, if you are still single, you are gonna need something ELSE to rely on – it starts with “person” and ends with “ality”. And honey, if I were you, I’d get a cat, because you are in for a rough ride.

cat lady

Ian Ironwood, who blogs at http://theredpillroom.blogspot.ca/2012/12/girl-game-why-its-not-hopeless.html has a really great post for women who are on the wrong side of forty, still single, still reasonably hot and still in the market for a husband and a father for her (highly improbable at this point) children. Ian has some great advice, which includes:

If you are a really attractive woman, pick a troll and behave with complete contempt towards him and always assume that he will be so grateful to be with a woman as hot as yourself that fidelity is pretty much assured and you can feel free to be a complete and total cunt in all aspects of your relationship because everyone knows ugly little troll men are just in it for good-looking tail and nothing else.


Oh wait. Oops. That’s not what he says at all.

I’m going to let you read Ian’s own words, but suffice to say, he has lots of words for women who still have some beauty left, rapidly declining fertility (it’s pretty much done by 40, ladies) and a heart longing for the love of a man. The best sentence in my opinion is this one: “While few of us expect to be “mothered” on a daily basis by our wives, there are indeed times in every man’s life when his success or failure depends on the matronly emotional support his wife can muster. If your wife can’t comfort you and make you feel better when you don’t feel well, it’s not ideal.”

Being a wife comes down to one word: COMFORT


How comforting is it that Betsy thought she had her man-meat in the bag because she’s just so damn hot? Women like Betsy give pretty women a bad name for so many reasons, and a lot of them are worth paying close attention to.

Being pretty does not automatically mean being vain. Pretty women are just pretty. They know how to use make-up skillfully to accentuate their already fine features and they understand that beauty affects people, and men in particular. Pretty woman are comfortable in their skin and careful with other people’s feelings, since they understand the very real advantages bestowed by beauty are an ENDOWMENT, not an accomplishment. A pretty woman can cruise by a mirror without a glance, because she KNOWS she looks good. A vain woman will always check her reflection, preen and be critical of herself. A vain woman is competitive and catty to other women, and sees men as accessories to make her look even hotter. That is why they choose ugly men. It’s the proverbial “choose ugly bridesmaids so you look even better” phenomena. Apparently, vain women also believe men to be completely stupid.

Betsy, really? You think your “boyfriend” doesn’t KNOW you think he’s ugly? Look at the situation from his perspective: he gets to fuck a hot chick while still having a meaningful relationship with a woman he apparently cares about, and he gets away with it because you think he’s too ugly to risk losing your fine ass.

Ha ha! Ooops! I kinda like Betsy’s boyfriend.

Pretty women aren’t scared of other pretty women or men, if they have even an ounce of awareness of the fact that pretty is something you are BORN and it’s very difficult to make. A woman can be attractive and well-groomed, to be certain. And honestly, any woman who cares about men WILL put some effort into how she looks, but beauty is something you are born with. One can be wonderfully attractive without being the slightest bit pretty, and beautiful women can be ugly, just through attitude alone. A woman who deliberately chooses a man she find unattractive because she thinks it gets her off the hook to actually work at her relationship is just straight up ugly, no matter what she looks like.

Pretty women know they still have to invest time and effort and cheer to make long term relationships work. Duh. If you wake up every morning next to Charlize Theron, pretty soon she’s just gonna be that bitch who hogs the blankets. A castrating, whining, complaining, never satisfied woman will find herself at the curb, eventually, no matter how beautiful she happens to be.


Betsy is a good cautionary tale for men everywhere. Don’t confuse pretty with desirable, unless your desire is just for pretty ass. In which case, carry on. A woman who cares about YOU, about your comfort, your needs, your desire, your vulnerabilities and your ambitions is a woman who is beautiful indeed. The simple act of caring about those things will ensure that she watches her weight, combs her hair once in a while and wraps her arms around you after a long hard day. She will listen to you and soothe you and find something warm and comforting for you to eat. I know I keep going back to this subject, but it’s so vital to life, how could it not be vital to a relationship: she needs to care about what you eat.

And in exchange she will have a man who cares deeply about her. A man who wouldn’t dream of hurting her. Who will always choose her first.


That’s how love works. You give, unreservedly, unconditionally, open-heartedly. And he gives back to you. And that’s a beautiful thing.

Lots of love,


%d bloggers like this: